User:TheCrownJul/Gay–straight alliance/Jaime Wegener Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

TheCrownJul


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gay–straight alliance
 * Gay–straight alliance

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

This lead is very good and succinct! I don't see anything that needs changing.

Content

One thing I as a reader might like to see a bit more of in the article is what sort of activities a GSA has. One thing I actively looked out for in the article was a history section, which I was able to find easily. I do think it could be possible to expound on some sections such as the inclusivity one which is somewhat brief.

Tone

Neutral

References

There is a good number of references here and I can see that they tend to be academic/scholarly.

Organization

It is easy to navigate the article.

Images

I think the article could potentially benefit from one more relevant image.

Overall Impressions

I can see that this article has been worked on carefully; there are lots of sources and relevant content. I think it could be good just to fill out the article a bit more, perhaps with some additional information about activities, one more picture, etc.