User:TheEffect1776/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Frame analysis

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I thought COMM 112 was interesting, so I went through the Communication categories and found it. I was surprised how long the page was.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article had a strong lead, but it ended in a choppy way. The content stays on-topic for the most part, but I don't know what the author was going for with the "For political thought" section; it was short and could provide more information on what those people did to improve frame analysis. There is some wording that could be more concise in the lead section ("However, framing is inevitable, as everyone does it"). The links work and are helpful to understand who some notable people are. The article was organized well, but some sentences could be reworded to increase clarity. There is no imagery, which decreased enjoyment and understanding while reading. The talk page only has one comment, and is rated as "Start-Class." Overall, the article gives a decent overview of frame analysis, but it would help to provide images and additional information in some sections.