User:TheLonePlush/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Design studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I have chosen this article because i am taking a course on digital design.

Evaluate the article
The lead of the article tells what the article is composed of but does not talk about the major points and was too wordy. Content of the article connected back to the lead but the lead did not talk about how design is shaped or historical figures. The article is not biased and is only sticking to facts there is nothing missing or is needed to make the article stronger and the information is up to date. The article is held up by reliable sources that range from 1980 to 2015 and are from multiple authors and does heavily relay on one source. most of the links for the citation work and can see the article that Design Studies was written from but some do not work. The article does not need better sources but is missing a citation for one of its key concepts, the sources it has are enough to support and tell clearly what design studies are but is missing one. The article is hard to read and assumes that the reader knows background info on the subject. The article is broken down into key points that makes sense and has little no no grammatical errors. there is only one image that shows how deep design studio is but could have more pictures to explain its concepts. The talk section has a lot of criticism towards the article stating things like the article is no hard to read and is missing a citation in one of the key topics. The article is hard to read and understand it gives information that is not needed and only makes confusion, all but one key concept has a citation. overall the article is poorly written because the information it gives is hard to understand and could not be learned from.