User:ThePromenader/Talk archive I

=Effaced Hardouin messages=

User Angelo94/Tonio94
Will you stop trying to paint me as someone "bad"? I went to check up on the above user this morning and saw the message you left him - You know full well that he will be alerted to my treatment of his contribution without your help, and that he would see my name for himself, so there was really no need to "indicate" it. And, if you please, the section was moved, not removed as you insinuated. Lastly, If ever you engage in any debate, come straight out and say what you mean directly to the person targeted. It will make discussion much simpler, over the table, and waylay potential feelings of animosity. Thank you.

T HE P ROMENADER 17:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

'Area' reverts, "metropolitan Paris" changes
Hardouin,

You may edit edits but you will not revert to your own previous version. Reverting such is a show of arrogance - it discredits (rather, ignores) the improvements a contributor was trying to make, and sends a message that you 'know better'. If you did know better no one would have any problem with the article as you wrote it, so go figure.

May I remind you that you have a whole slew of arguements to answer to, and I have not been the only one to ask you to do this. Your answer to El_C was rather blithe I may say. I am taking my time with the edits but will install them once they're ready - it's still not too late to discredit my arguments by providing references proving them false. You will not ignore arguments and pre-emptive discussion - it's arrogant and rude, and again suggests that 'you know better' - if you did know better you would provide references to prove it. T HE P ROMENADER 09:31, 22 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Where will your arrogant foolishness end? You are enforcing a POV unsupported by any publication. Stop.  T HE P ROMENADER  13:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Revert-o-Rama bis bis bis
Hardouin,

Your behaviour is inexcusable. If you would like to voice your very minority personal opinions as fact without any contest from others, perhaps you should start a publication of your own. This is Wiki, where one is expected to a) publish fact b) in a way accessible to others c) in accepting that others may also wish to contribute to the same subject in d) participating in discussions based on reason, not opinions, and e) do so in a civil, honest and straightforward manner. So far you have failed on all counts.  T HE P ROMENADER  20:28, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I just saw your little contribution to El_C's talk page. I would have asked him to contact you directly but that is for him to decide. As for your comments there, again you attack vehemently nothing in particular in my behaviour in an effort to make me look 'bad'. Stop this please. I contest the veracity of what you write, not 'you' - you would make life much easier for yourself would you separate yourself from fact, as the facts get on quite fine without us after we leave them. Opinion, of course, is another matter.


 * By the way, for the sake of mediation, I archived the talk messages you eliminated. T HE P ROMENADER  22:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)