User:TheRegionalManager/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Impressionism

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is of intrest to me as an impresionist artist. My first impression is very good, it gives a good overview on the topic and its beginning and the reasonings for its initial oppression.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article opens very well i think giving a good concept of what impresionist painting is and what the painter aimed to capture. It is quick and to the point, i think it could use more on their style and about how it also employ's bold brushwork as well as colors. the article is well written and does not have any angle or pitch to it. there are many citations from many different sites. the article does not focus on any particular artist instead tells of many different one's including references to more unknown ones and those that inspired the impsresionitsts. The pages talk page show's that the original page was made in 2001 but was redone as a school project in 2022. There has not been much talk on it but it has been commented it was worked on by many people at one point. Overall i think that the article is very well written and covers the topics origins, what its about and relating topics well. The only thing i think that could possibly be changed is to make the opening a little more clear on what the impresionist style is. ~