User:TheWittyOwls/Skunk City/Cfellowss Peer Review

General info
TheWittyOwls
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:TheWittyOwls/Skunk City
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Skunk City

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead doesn't appear to have been changed, but since the original article was basically just a lead and nothing else, fixing that won't be too difficult. Since there's so much new information here now, pretty much the entire lead is now redundant, but again that's a good problem to have.

The amount of information that's been added is staggering, and all amazingly relevant. In-line citations link to other articles, citations are plentiful and useful, and every key detail is covered. I'd suggest that maybe the census data in the demographics section could be turned into a graph so as not to make the paragraph too thick, and also avoid usage of words like "notably", since the reader should come to their own conclusions on that. Aside from maybe including a picture or two, I honestly have nothing besides little grammatical nitpicks to offer. This is a fantastic addition to an article that really didn't say a whole lot besides geography and origin myths before.