User:TheWittyOwls/Skunk City/Luxiiinyu Peer Review

General info
Olivia Valcourt, TheWittyOwls
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:TheWittyOwls/Skunk City
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:TheWittyOwls/Skunk City

Lead:
The lead presents Skunk City's general situation, location, and origin of the name in a clear way, which is very good. And the content that appears in this is described in detail in the main content below. But I think what can be improved is that the authors can mention the main topics here in the introduction paragraph, so that readers can have a general understanding of the article.

Content:
The main paragraphs are planned very clearly, and the reader can flow smoothly and fluently while reading. In addition, the authors did a very good job of using a large number of reliable sources and presenting them in a neutral way. Especially in the demographic section, the information provided is very detailed and comprehensive. In the article, there are also hyperlinks to some professional names or organization names, and confused readers can click to jump to the relevant Wikipedia page. Very good!

However, there is still room for improvement. For example, I think it is possible to add some pictures about this area on the page, so that readers can have a visual understanding of this area! In general, this is a great job!