User:The Social Experimenter/Cancel culture/AWeis16 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(AWeis16)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Cancel culture
 * Cancel culture

Evaluate the drafted changes
I couldn't find any of your drafting (if you have any) so I thought I would make suggestions based on the article as it is now.


 * Someone wrote this: Pam Palmater writes in Maclean's magazine that cancel culture differs from accountability in her article about the public backlash surrounding Canadian politicians who vacationed during COVID-19, despite pandemic rules not to. It is in the criticism of concept section. To me, this seems like it's not a great source, as it's a Canadian magazine, and seems to be... I don't know, not really pertinent?
 * I don't know if there's any good articles specifying this, but one thing that might be good to put on the page is the idea that while cancel culture doesn't often work, it can lead to important discussions about what the person did or said and how they (and others) might educate themselves on what they did wrong and hopefully learn from it. Again, not sure if there's a good article talking about this, but in my own social media ventures, a lot of time cancel culture doesn't work. A person is 'cancelled' but people still watch them or give them money and attention. Even negative attention is attention, and it still puts money in their pockets and they don't really learn.