User:The Wicked Witch Of The North/Alexander Denny/Caitlyn.Lefebvre Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
First of all I want to say Good Job! Your article as it is presently is great and I think you are discussing a very important historical figure for more modern Canadian history.

Lead

The Lead section of your article is very well done! It is engaging and informative, overall a great brief description of the historic figure you've chosen to write your Wikipedia article on. Furthermore, there is no unnecessary information or excess of information in this section. It is short, concise and captures the interest of the reader to continue learning about Alexander Denny.

Content:

In the Early Life section it would be interesting to know what kind of Mi’kmaq tradition he would have been taught as part of his cultural education. Though, I understand this information is probably difficult to obtain so even if it is just examples of what he could have learned it would be better than nothing. Also, if possible I think it would be interesting if you could elaborate further on Alexander Denny's formal education, like where he attended university.

In terms of the Political Involvement section of the article it would be interesting to learn what the UNSI is and how responded to the White Paper. Also, it might be interesting to mention of the UNSI actually accomplished what it set out to do in the battle for the Mi'kmaq's right to their treaties and Indigenous rights. Like did the UNSI actually spark any great social or political debates around the issues of the White Paper or was it largely ignored by the general public. Adding information like that could help clarify and cement the extent of Denny's political involvement in these historic Canadian and Indigenous moments.

In the Mi'kmaq Society vs Canada section I am curious to know if there were any responses to Denny's letter and what the outcome of Denny bringing this issue to the Human Rights Committee of the United Nation was.

Apart from those small improvements the content is great and doesn't seem to be missing any big topics or information pertaining to Alexander Denny. There seems to a lot of great information and its just missing some small details that could really level up the contribution.

Tone & Organization:

The tone throughout the article is neutral and does not in any way contain an element of bias or opinion. The article is very well organized and easy to read through. The headings and sub-headings are well positioned and make the overview of the article easy to navigate when searching for specific information.

Sources:

All of the sources used throughout the article seem to be good and used in a highly professional and academic way. The use of citation in this article actually helped me learn how I should be citing in my article, so that's super helpful. All of the references are up to date, come from scholarly sources, and have varied authors. The only suggestion I have is if possible finding a PDF copy of Denny's letter to the UN and using it as a reference in the bibliography, that way it is there for people to learn more from.

Overall Impression:

Overall I thought the article was concise, informative, and very well done! There are a few little things the author could choose to add in the content section of the article to add a little more depth but nothing major. All of the elements for a good Wikipedia contribution were there and I felt as though I learned something from reading it. Thank you for your contribution and AWESOME JOB :)