User:The ed17/Archives/121

I would like to have your input in a discussion
Hi,

I would appreciate it if you could give your input regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_naval_ship_classes_in_service#Split_this_article_into_multiple_articles Thanks in advance Dragnadh (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2017
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 21:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aileen Hernandez
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Aileen Hernandez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aileen Hernandez
The article Aileen Hernandez you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aileen Hernandez for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . I'll circle back on this asap. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

USS Oklahoma
Hey Ed. I've been doing some work to finish up USS Oklahoma (BB-37) to prep it for GA but I'm a bit rusty having been out of the process for a few years. I see you've done some editing on the article in the meantime, is there anything else there you think might be missing source-wise? Thanks! — Ed! (talk) 02:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey, Good to see you back around the place. I think that there is more information out there, especially on the Pearl Harbor attack, but that its current state is good enough for GA. Phister et al is the big source that I'm aware of (and own!), and you've cited them extensively. On the design section, do you have Friedman's US Battleships? If not, I do and would be happy to add some info to the article. I should have time to do a more detailed source check in the next few days, and add the info in the next few weeks. (I have a work trip next week which is going to take up all of my time.) Not sure how long you'll be able to wait. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Blocked IP back
That particular IP that I mentioned last month, is back.


 * 92.2.42.128

Judging from this edit, the IP is also using 79.71.30.230. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Blocked the 92*, they've moved on from the previous one. Amused that they think Baal is a Jewish diety... - The Bushranger One ping only 03:17, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks,, for jumping in here while I was out. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:05, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018
{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color: #7FFFD4; border: 2px solid #00FFFF; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"
 * Facto Post – Issue 8 – 15 January 2018

 

Metadata on the March
From the days of hard-copy liner notes on music albums, metadata have stood outside a piece or file, while adding to understanding of where it comes from, and some of what needs to be appreciated about its content. In the GLAM sector, the accumulation of accurate metadata for objects is key to the mission of an institution, and its presentation in cataloguing.

Today Wikipedia turns 17, with worlds still to conquer. Zooming out from the individual GLAM object to the ontology in which it is set, one such world becomes apparent: GLAMs use custom ontologies, and those introduce massive incompatibilities. From a recent article by, we quote the observation that "vocabularies needed for many collections, topics and intellectual spaces defy the expectations of the larger professional communities." A job for the encyclopedist, certainly. But the data-minded Wikimedian has the advantages of Wikidata, starting with its multilingual data, and facility with aliases. The controlled vocabulary — sometimes referred to as a "thesaurus" as term of art — simplifies search: if a "spade" must be called that, rather than "shovel", it is easier to find all spade references. That control comes at a cost. Case studies in that article show what can lie ahead. The schema crosswalk, in jargon, is a potential answer to the GLAM Babel of proliferating and expanding vocabularies. Even if you have no interest in Wikidata as such, simply vocabularies V and W, if both V and W are matched to Wikidata, then a "crosswalk" arises from term v in V to w in W, whenever v and w both match to the same item d in Wikidata.

For metadata mobility, match to Wikidata. It's apparently that simple: infrastructure requirements have turned out, so far, to be challenges that can be met.

Links
To subscribe to Facto Post go to Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below. Editor, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here. Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * 1lib1ref campaign starts today, see The Wikipedia Library/1Lib1Ref: also #1lib1ref introductory video by
 * Funders should mandate open citations, article 9 January 2018 in Nature by David Shotton
 * From snowflake to avalanche: Possibilities of using free citation data in libraries, translation from the German original of Annette Klein, Mannheim University Library
 * GLAM/Newsletter/December 2017/Contents/WMF GLAM report
 * Why Mickey Mouse’s 1998 copyright extension probably won't happen again: Copyrights from the 1920s will start expiring next year if Congress doesn't act, Timothy B. Lee, 8 January 2018, Arstechnica
 * }

The Signpost: 16 January 2018
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aileen Hernandez
The article Aileen Hernandez you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Aileen Hernandez for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wizardman -- Wizardman (talk) 16:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

FAC for A-150 Design
I cleaned up this low-hanging fruit a little in preparation for a FAC; take a look and make whatever changes you see fit as I'd like to nom it with you as the co-nom considering that you did most of the work. Lemme know if that's cool by you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! Will look asap. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Took a look and did a bunch of copyediting. I'd love to get off G&D as the main source there, but I'm not seeing much more than a crazy number of counterfactual/alternate history forum posts. It doesn't look like Mark Stille even tried to cover them in Imperial Japanese Navy Battleships 1941-45. (This implies that Warship vol. 3 has a bit, but I'm not convinced there's much there given the table of contents.) Should we add any info on Japan's strategic considerations and later war situation, even if it doesn't actually mention the A-150s? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I have that volume of Warship and it's not much use to us. I don't recall seeing anything significant on the A-150s in the issues of Contributions to the History of IJN Warships that I have, but I'll take another look when I'm less full of good beer. I'm not sure if we should expand the strategic discussion because it's obvious to us, but maybe not so much to ordinary readers. Hard to tell, but maybe we submit it to FAC and see if of those guys think that more coverage is necessary.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing of relevance in the issues of Contributions.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, that's a shame, but I suppose not a big surprise given the whole destruction of primary documents thing. Happy to ask the non-specialists at FAC for their opinion on the wider context. Do you want to nominate, or shall I? :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 06:20, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why don't you handle it; I've got family stuff for most of the day.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 04:59, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

I've made a first pass at expanding the background section, swiping some pieces of the Yamato class article. Take a look at it whenever you get a chance and make whatever changes you feel are necessary as I'm not sure about how it flows.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't have that volume of Garke & Dulin, but we need to be consistent about when the design work for the A-150s stopped as we have one date in the lede and another in the main body.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I should in theory be able to get to this on Sunday. :-) Will check the date as well. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:03, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Great--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
 * I think I've addressed all of this - thoughts? Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it's been the week from hell. I'll take a look at it now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries—I hope it's gotten better. I've addressed the other comments there, I believe. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:23, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

I took a stab addressing Moisejp's latest comment; see what you think as I'm not entirely satisfied with the phrasing. Is it weird that we've got a lot of comments, but not a single support?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
 * How does that look? Not sure on the supports. Nick may be waiting on me to go check Muir. ;-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:11, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that that looks fine. Reworking the text a little more broadly like you did makes it flow better. Maybe that's why I was dissatisfied with my efforts. I can hope so, anyways, but I sure couldn't figure why that was.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:57, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries—isn't this just a great example of wiki collaboration at its finest? ;-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I do believe that you are correct!--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arrest and death of Otto Warmbier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Foreign exchange ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Arrest_and_death_of_Otto_Warmbier check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Arrest_and_death_of_Otto_Warmbier?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 1977 Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-134 hijacking
Hello! Your submission of 1977 Aeroflot Tupolev Tu-134 hijacking at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 26
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 26, December – January 2018  Arabic and French versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta!
 * # 1Lib1Ref
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: What can we glean from OCLC’s experience with library staff learning Wikipedia?
 * Bytes in brief

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)