User:Thealexjr100/Meridian (novel)/KevinT99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
This is a peer review I'm doing for the novel meridian. I think that the information included in this article is relevant, but I do believe improvements can be made to the opening introduction. The wording feels jumbled in a sense, it does not flow as well as I believe it can. I also think that a bibliography and possibly additional references should be included. The reason I feel this way is because I noticed that there are not many references included. Even though I believe that there are improvements to be made, I like the overall content of the body paragraph. It touches on important concepts that were vital to the novel of Meridian. So I do think that this can be a positive contribution to the article but I also think that minor improvements can take this edit to another level.