User:Thebestcasescenario/sandbox

Article Evaluation
The Wikipedia page that I decided to analyze is Black Lives Matter.

This page is extremely relevant to people in society because the campaign's main focus is against violence and systemic racism towards black people. This movement formed about 4 years ago and is often discussed in day to day conversations. There is not much that distracted me when reading this article a lot of the information stayed relevant to the topic. There are a little signs of bias in this article but it does a good job of presenting a neutral stance on the #BlackLivesMatter movement. From the citations that I selected, all of the links work and lead to websites that related to their information. Most of the citations are recognizable websites and there are a couple of news articles in the citations as well. These news articles related to the events stated in the article. Some of the news articles are biased but the article does a good job of presenting the information as neutral. In the Talk's page, I can see that other people have expressed their opinions in an evaluation. They are also talking about how they feel that the article is too one sided and only explains one side of the story. I think that Wikipedia gives details on the specific events that we talked about in class. This article has a lot of valid information pertaining to the origin of the movement and major events that the movement took part in.