User:Thee.outkast/Evaluate an Article

Poarch Band of Creek Indians


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in this article is in fact related to the topic and nothing distracted me from the main topic.


 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?


 * Everything in this article is up to date from the history to the tribe’s biggest investments.


 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?


 * There are no notable equity gaps that can identified. The article represents the tribe great.


 * What else could be improved?
 * The opening could be more detailed and discuss more of their background.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?


 * The article is in fact told from a neutral perspective and not biased.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?


 * The article’s viewpoints are slightly underrepresented.


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?


 * The links between the articles do work. These sources such as city names, counties and locations support the claims in the articles.


 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?


 * Each of the sources included in the articles are appropriate, reliable and relate to the article. Each source is unbiased and neutral.


 * Do the sources come from a diverse array of authors and publications?


 * The sources come from a wide range of authors and publications.

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?


 * A lot of the writers are discussing the edits they made to the article to correct certain terminologies that the creek Indians use to make sure that they do not offend them in any way.


 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?


 * Yes, it is a part of the WikiProject Alabama and the WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America.