User:Thee.outkast/Vanessa Williams/Thee.outkast Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Vanessa Williams
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The lead summarizes the entire articles very well because it includes a generalization of what is discussed. The content in the article is in fact related to the topic and the facts are up to date. The tone of this article is very neutral and unbiased. None of the claims in this article were one sided or opinionated. Most of the sources and references were very reliable, while however some were irrelevant. The sources work and are current. The images are well captioned but her bio image could be updated. This article is very well written when it comes to details, citations and the information overall. The structure of the article is put together very well. The articles talks about each different aspect of her career. The Miss America section could have been more detailed when it came to talk about her scandal. However, I feel that the "Name" sections is irrelevant to the article because it has nothing to do with what she has accomplished in her career. Some of the headings could be switched into the order of how she went through them in life. Overall I think that the article is very well written and it's very up to date on information, however just a few aspects could be arranged.
 * Ha, please don't do this in one single paragraph. The Miss America section has a link to a main article--Vanessa Williams and Miss America. A lot of the references are not rendered neatly and that's a shame (refs. 58, 59, 60 are particularly inept). Dr Aaij (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)