User:Theepicosity/GAList

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria




 * 1) Is it well written?
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):


 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * a. (reference section):
 * a. (reference section):


 * b. (inline citations to reliable sources):
 * b. (inline citations to reliable sources):


 * c. (OR):
 * c. (OR):


 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * e. (source spot-check):
 * e. (source spot-check):
 * e. (source spot-check):


 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * a. (major aspects):
 * a. (major aspects):


 * b. (focused):
 * b. (focused):


 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Fair representation without bias:


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * No edit wars, etc.:


 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):


 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass, fail or on hold:
 * Pass, fail or on hold: