User:Thename100/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Oocyte selection

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I am interested in gynecology and pediatrics as well as ethics of medicine. Oocyte selections is a good fit for this areas which is why I decided to expand research in it and develop its wikipedia page as well.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

My article does not outline what it talks about in the lead section. The article does not have organized sections and it is a little bit all over the place. There is no major idea the article points to. It just gives description and sentences without really explaining the oocyte technique. There is close paraphrasing in one of the sources. The sources are not as recent. Latest one is 2014 while oldest in 2010. The content is relevant, however it missing a lot of parts. It does not talk about underrepresented groups. The tone and balance of the article is fine. It does not have any images but has links to metaphase images of another wikipedia page. No conversation has taken place on the talk page. The article needs to have major sections and its introduction and conclusion needs to be (re)written. This article is underdeveloped.