User:Thenihalsingh/sandbox

Link to Assignment of Article Evaluation



Possible Articles to Work on:

Weight training:Weight training

I want to add my knowledge of weight training including adding depth to the article. The talk page has some suggestions over citations which also require fixing. Weight training constantly changes from what it was before as well so it needs to be updated.

Auto Racing:Pro FWD

This article is quite brief and too limited in terms of content. It is in Wikiprojects therefore needs some work before become notable and needs its sources checked as it contains very detailed knowledge that is quite brief.

Religion: Agrasen

The span of religion subcategories is very exclusive of many minority religions and doesn't contain enough content and subsections within each religion. This is also included in the talks as some articles are underdeveloped and not covered properly.

{anchor: FinalArticle}

Bibliography section|User:Thenihalsingh/sandbox|Final Article}}

Final Article: I'm focusing on Blockchain: Blockchain

Through this I will find sources and articles like I did before and create edits. I will also monitor the talk page to see any feedback on my sources. I can add further depth into how it affects different aspects in the real world while expanding on the topic itself.


 * Investopedia
 * Blockchain Wikipedia
 * Cointelegraph


 * 1) Investopedia Page
 * 2) Blockchain analysis
 * 3) Cointelegraph Article

Response to Peer Reviews:

"Hey this is Komal! Your contributions are reliable and a great addition to the article. I really like the examples you gave, they weren’t biased at all but I would definitely suggest to have diverse sources and include more sources in general. The tone is definitely strong, just needs more contributions to make it stronger. Other than that good job and good luck!"

Nihal-Hi Komal, thank you so much for your response. I will accumulate a further variety of sources to contribute more content in my writing as I definitely need more diverse sources such as indirect ones. I will keep an eye out for more sources that can lead me to make a stronger article with solid points.

"I think everything you added will be beneficial to the article as most things are explained very minimally. You do a good job of tagging different wikipedia articles to help explain what you are writing but I think adding more information to help a broader range of readers understand would be helpful. Being more explicit on the difference between nodes and mining nodes and what the different uses of a hash are, are the first two I thought of."

Nihal- Hi Go23bears, Thank you so much for your constructive criticism. I will definitely dive back into my paragraphs and look at the difference in nodes and mining nodes to make them more differentiable for the audience to read. I understand I need to add more content through diverse sources with easier language so other people can understand better.

"Hi! The contributions you made to the Blockchain article all are very related, and they were definitely on the needed sections. I saw that there is a subtitle in the article about cryptocurrencies, maybe you can add the Bitcoin part of your contributions there to make it more understandable. Also, I’m not sure if we can add a Wikipedia article as a source, but you can use Santiago Siri and the articles we have read about him for the blockchain. I feel like it was the focus of that week. Hope it helps!"

Nihal- Hi Beril, I appreciate the positive review and the suggestions. I like how you related some content to class I will definitely implement it into the content of my writing to make it more detailed and credible as a source. The cryptocurrencies part can definitely be geared toward Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as well since Blockchain deals with a multitude of them.