User:Thenoirroze/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Music theory

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I personally was interested because I love music, and make music. It matters because it discusses the history of music and its relation and play off of psychology. It also discuses why certain notes sound so well together and why we keep going back to some songs.

Evaluate the article
The article begins with a strong introductory sentence, clarifying in a few short words what music theory is. It's sources and content are well up to date, with edits dating up to February 1, 2021, and sources dating up to 2017. Judging from the amount of fluid updates and edits to the article, it seems as if the article itself is growing as time flows on.

The talk page has been treated as people's personal biddings for a paragraph within the article. For example, a talk thread is titled, "What is a chord". There are no true suggestions in the talking space for improvements, and along with that, no true interaction with the topics posted within the talk place of the Wikipedia article.

The article has many subsections to it, explaining topics that relate from melody to even mathematics. Even with all these topics covered, the article seems a bit lackluster in audio or video examples, even with it being about music theory. Outside of that flaw, the article seems to held from a strong neutral point of view. It holds a strong emphasis on the lengthy history of music theory before getting into the true meat and potatoes of the article. This article exhibits most things that we learned to be needed/good in a Wikipedia article, that is outside of spelling and grammar which has been a longstanding problem within the edits of the article. The article is very much well-developed in all standings.