User:TherealHarv/Choose an Article

Option 1

 * Business communication

Article Evaluation
Within the scope of one WikiProject, ranking as Start-Class at Mid-importance. The introduction of the topic is quite long and has sections that are needed to define/describe the topic. Cutting down on the information in this section would be beneficial. Overview/History section has a lot of information but at the same time doesn't have much information that is helpful to the reader, the third paragraph has some information that interesting as well as the media channels for the communication to occur, but the name of this section should just be overview as no history is discussed, so changing the title would be important. Media channels for business communication can be moved into the methods section as they are methods for communicating. More information is needed in the business communication studies subsection as it doesn't explain much and is too short to tell the reader much. Managing negative section although important doesn't seem to be something that works with the rest of the article and seems to go off topic. Barriers section has potential to be important for the topic but more research needs to be done so that the reader can obtain a larger understanding. Organization tab is basically a section for readers to go investigate more for themselves, might be better to have more information rather than a list of each organization. Quite a few sources, might need to put them to better use, the article also says that it needs additional citation for verification. Overall the article has potential but does need quite a bit of work to reach a good spot.

Option 2

 * Professional communication

Article Evaluation
Within the scope of one WikiProject, ranking as a C-class at Low-importance. Starting off lack of citations and references, there is one reference and several notes, so the article definitely needs more research done. The article says it needs more citations for verification and it also says that the article possibly contains original research. There isn't much to say about the article because it is missing so much information, and it feels like it is lacking so much. The sections don't seem to match the way a typical Wikipedia page would look, changing that would be needed. Editing this page would allow for quite a bit of room to wiggle and research. There isn't anything much that I can say positively about the way the article has been written. I don't have much to say as I feel like the whole page needs a revamp.

Option 3

 * Internal communications

Article Evaluation
Within the scope of two WikiProjects, both rank it as a start-class at mid-importance. Although the article is only a start class article, it looks well done, has a lot of information. There are a lot of references and citations for the article. I know that the article is at start class but out of the 3 that I have looked at for this assignment it is the best one and has very great potential, the only thing that I find I do not like about the way the article is done is that the images in the article don't really feel like they go along with the topic and the captions for them do not explain how they relate.