User:Thisisaaronfox/Glyphosate-based herbicides/Ra07847 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Thisisaaronfox/Glyphosate-based herbicides


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thisisaaronfox/Glyphosate-based_herbicides?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Glyphosate-based herbicides

Evaluate the drafted changes
Although the author has not updated or added to the information included, some of the main sections of the article, such as "regulatory history" and "supply chain issues," are missing information. The lead for this article is very detailed and informative and is divided into different sections for the rest of the article.The article is packed with a lot of information that is relevant to the topic and up-to date, however little was added by the assigned peer. Because the article seems to be fully packed with information it seems that there may not have been a lot that could have been added to the article. The page appears to be jam-packed with information, thus it appears like there may not have been much more that could have been included. The essay had a highly informed and impartial tone. The given source offers a number, and the one that was picked represents rats inhaling glyphosate for 4 hours, but the paper makes no mention of how the LC50 was calculated. The sources for this page are quite current; some are from the last ten years, and all of the writers have professional credentials.The article contained very few if any grammatical errors.The article would look better if it included a picture of glyphosate with clear captions. Overall, good content was contributed, however it amounted to only two sentences. The destiny of glyphosate in the environment and other things need to be covered in much greater detail.