User:Thoel/sandbox

ARTICLE EVALUATION

For my evaluation I am looking at the Ancient Egypt page. The article seemed to be completely dedicated to the topic. I did not see that there was any bias in the article, but what i read from the expensive talk page showed that there are, understandably, competing views about the identities of different people involved in the history of Egypt. All links that I used were working and supported the information cited. The article does reference "some scholars" but includes other beliefs as well. Considering that edits have been made and debates have been had on the talk page constantly leading up to this month, I would assume that all of the information is up to date. However, the newest source I could find was from 2008. The article should be as reliable as possible as it is a featured and semi-protected article. Compared to what we have read about ancient Egypt, the main difference is some emphasis on technology, medicine, math, etc. Also, about half of the article is dedicated to the different periods.