User:Thomasdquigley/Oyster toadfish/Slaw88 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Thomasdquigley


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thomasdquigley/Oyster_toadfish?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Oyster toadfish

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The Lead section has not been modified in the draft. I will suggest to modify the lead section as you update the article.

The added content is relevant to the topic but are not related to evolution which is a requirement for this course. References are lacking, so it is quite difficulty to access their currency. I will advise adding references and content relevant to the evolution.

The added contents are neutral in tone, and not persuasive of any viewpoint.

The content is well-written and well organized into sections. But, there are a number of missing punctuations, nouns and substitution of certain words with symbols such as X, Y and Z.

Overall, this is a good update on the article. Please keep the suggested improvements at heart as you develop the article. I look forward to reading an updated version soon.