User:Thomsaleme/Eugene J. de Sabla, Jr., Teahouse and Tea Garden/ReedP12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)

Thomsaleme


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Very well written page. Goes above and beyond expectations and provides a detailed history of both the tea house and tea garden. Article is fully developed, providing a chronological timeline for the entire history of the site. Article is broken up into small, easy to read sections of different information about the site.

Sources are also compiled very well. Good mix of sources from different time periods. Provides the original document from the National Register of Historic Places as well as other primary sources.