User:ThoomBOY/Malinvestment/Djronkus20 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

ThoomBOY


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ThoomBOY/Malinvestment?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Malinvestment

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Since you've only made one addition so far in the sandbox compared to the current version of the article, there is not much I can say in this peer review, but what I see so far seems pretty good. Your addition is neutral and unbiased while expounding upon the topic at hand in a relevant way. It doesn't seem overly detailed since it is in the lead section, which is good, and I can definitely see you expanding upon this further down the article. Moreover, the source you used is up to date and I assume you used your source correctly since you used it in your research paper. Since this article is still very underdeveloped, I think trying to format the page with subheadings will help the transition of this article from a start to a stub at least.