User:Thparkth/afdanalysis/Praise and veneration of Muhammad

The result of the discussion was delete. Although the number of !voters on each "side" was similar, the weight of policy-based argument was almost entirely on the side of the "delete" !voters. It was persuasively argued by supporters of the article that in principle this is a notable (or encyclopedic) topic. However, notability was not the reason for the nomination, and a large number of other serious policy concerns were raised about the article as it currently exists. Delete !voters cited WP:SYNTH, WP:OR, and WP:QUOTEFARM among others, and these serious policy issues were not countered during this discussion.