User:Threeafterthree/newsubpage/FNC

Time to set the record straight on bias in the lead
User:Aaron, User:Gamaliel, User:Blaxthos, User:Isarig, User:AuburnPilot, User:Edders, User:FeloniousMonk, User:Ramsquire, User:Rama, User:Cordless Larry, User:Cbuhl79, (later brought up on RfArb charges due to conduct) User:Mrmiscellanious, User:GTBacchus, User:Doldrums, User:Tbeatty, User:Blueboar, User:Doldrums, User:Kevin Baas
 * If anybody wants to spend 4-5 hours going over the archives, some things become clear. The repition that consensus of first 18+ editors, then 40, then 100s of editors is laughable. This article has been "owned" by no more than 5-6 editors (if that, more like 3 and one bad sockpupet/strawman) over the last 2 1/2 years. There names and anti FNC bias are pretty clear. Why has this "issue" gone on for 2 1/2 years without end? Becasue new editors wander by, comment, are told about the 18+ editors(if not 100s) who painstakingly hammered out this consensus and then are shown the door. Tom (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * List of "infamous 18":

User:Arzel, User:Bytebear, User:DMCer, User:Wikiport, User:Soxwon, User:Happyme22.
 * User who might be interested in this discussion:


 * Comments from other editors welcomed below: