User:Throwshade/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Oncology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
Oncology is a medical franchise concerned with detecting, preventing, and exploring potential and effective cancer treatment. Cancer comes in various shapes, sizes, and types; some variants can be fatal, whereas some are treatable if detected on time. Oncology has various sub-branches that deal with its specific variant. Various research and investigations were conducted over the years, including trials for different treatments to determine the probability of their success in treating cancer. There are ample amounts of facts and details available about cancer all over the globe, which are accessible via the internet, and the most common source of information is Wikipedia. Considering this topic's seriousness, this article should be a Featured Article. However, it is a C-class article, which means it is an intermediate article with room for improvement. Upon reading the article carefully and looking at the links, I saw that many things can be improved in this article.

Evaluate the article
The article is thought-through and comprises multiple cancer studies, prevention, diagnosis, and potential and effective treatment.

Strengths:

The article provides an encyclopedic outline of the subject, including factors such as period of diagnosis, cure, medication, and adequate sustenance. Involvement of the moral and ethical issues surrounding this topic and how they have played a crucial role in the evolution of its diagnosis, possible future treatments, the extent of the trials over the years, and its potential consequences in the future developments in the field of oncology.

The article's content is systematized and arranged explicitly into specific units, which makes it viewer and reader-friendly. The article also provides facts and information about other oncology franchises, including divisions and subdivisions, so that users can dive deeper in case they are interested in specific subdivisions concerning their interests.

The article references reputed resources and cites that back the details provided and act as evidence to the claims made in the article, assuring legibility and authenticity of the content.

Scope of Improvement:

The article requires more citations and references, and it is mentioned in the article itself.The research and study on the topic continue, and new developments arise, so it is crucial to update the information so that the readers are updated.The article contains a single image, and more visual data would make it easier to comprehend; for example, adding tables and figures would make it better.The article also needs some corrections in the grammatical errors, and specific medical terminologies could be replaced with simple words that are easy to read for the viewers since everybody is not from a medical backdrop.

In conclusion, the article is informational and systemized, but the above mentioned changes could be considered to keep it up to date and retain its legibility and standards.