User:Thryduulf/ITN analysis

This is my subjective analysis of stories nominated for WP:ITN, whether posted or not. It excludes:


 * Stories nominated for the recent deaths section;
 * Nominations for removing items from Ongoing;
 * Any stories that were stale when nominated;
 * Nominations that were withdrawn before a consensus could be formed.

All nominations are for blurbs unless noted otherwise.


 * Region is the primary country or region to which the story relates
 * R indicates whether the event is listed at WP:ITN/R
 * Topic is a high level indication of the type of story (e.g. international politics, natural disaster, etc)
 * Date is the date of nomination (not necessarily date of the event)
 * A indicates whether there is a standalone target article. In all cases I've only considered the article(s) listed in the "Article" parameter of the nomination template.
 * A is a standalone article (or articles) specifically about the event, two letters indicate target articles fall in different categories.
 * B is one or more sections on a slightly wider article (e.g. section about the final on an article about a sports competition)
 * C is an update to one or more wider article(s) (e.g. update of a biography due to death)
 * P is whether the story was posted. RD indicates a story was nominated for a blurb but posted to RD.
 * Q indicates whether there were quality issues with the article.
 * "Yes" indicates the story would have been posted if it weren't for quality issues.
 * "Part" indicates that there were quality issues and that these played a part in why it wasn't posted but they were not the only reason
 * "?" indicates there were quality issues but it is unclear if it would have been posted otherwise
 * "No" indicates either that there were quality issues but these were not the reason why the story was not posted, or that there were no quality issues.
 * O is my subjective opinion. A indicates I think process worked correctly; B indicates I think it worked incorrectly; C it's unclear.
 * A1 - Should have been posted and was posted (or would have been if there were no quality issues)
 * A2 - Should not have been posted and was not posted (for reasons other than quality)
 * B1 - Should have been posted but wasn't posted (for reasons other than quality)
 * B2 - Should not have been posted but was (or would have been if there were no quality issues
 * C1 - Should have been posted but wasn't posted (but unclear if it would have been if quality wasn't a factor)
 * C2 - Should not have been posted and was not posted (but unclear if it would have been if quality wasn't a factor)