User:Thunder thighs of justice and vengeance/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Beatriz Barba

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

i picked the first name that seemed interesting and I'm sticking with her because I saw the name Xibalbá and that Barba is an archeologist, which is a field I think should be given more importance.

Evaluate the article
The lead should be focused on other accomplishments and instead what her research was, what she uncovered, what she specialized in. It isn't telling us what the article is going to touch on or why Barba was 'the second woman in her country to earn a degree in archaeology'. Her titles mentioned in the lead are not mentioned again in the article, giving us no additional information those achievements of hers.

The paragraph on her early life is subpar and definitely has room for improvement, both with the content and how the sentences were written and organized. However, he 'chapter' on her career is thorough, providing a lot good information, although it could be organized better, less erratic.

They also included a list of all the books she's published but there isn't a description, summary of abstract to any of them, which is a little confusing and disorienting, but at least they're there.

Everything in the article is useful and subjective information, although it could be better organized.

The bibliography is heavy with reliable sources.

The article doesn't include any pictures of Barba. The article is rated at a medium C level, the average grammar and organization shows this, as well as the minimal information. Although, because it lists her publications it balances it out, leading it to be an article of medium rate instead of lower.