User:Thunderclaw2/Corynebacterium xerosis/Rieboom Peer Review

General info
Thunderclaw2
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Thunderclaw2/Corynebacterium xerosis
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Corynebacterium xerosis

Lead
The lead has a descriptive first sentence and provides a concise overview of what will be covered in the rest of the article.

Content
The content is relevant and appears to be up-to-date. A brief description or distinction of Corynebacterium amycolatum and striatum might supplement understanding in the Clinical Relevance section.

Tone and Balance
The content is neutral.

Sources and References
The sources added are reliable and appear to be current. A wide range of sources are included as well.

Organization
The content added is well organized into sections. Within the sections there are some sentences that might be written more clearly and/or concisely. The organization of some sentences within the sections might be rearranged to create better flow.

Images and Media
There are no images or media.

Overall Impressions
This draft includes relevant information and pulls from a substantial pool of sources. The flow of the article might be improved by tweaking some of the word choice and rearranging some sentences and/or adding more transitions.