User:ThunderhillMc/Déjà vu/Cherry.Paint Peer Review

General info
(ThunderhillMc)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:ThunderhillMc/Déjà vu
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):I am not sure what this is.

Evaluate the drafted changes
I really enjoy the work that has been added; in fact, like most of our submissions, our weeks of work have made it so that there is very little to improve. If this were their final draft, I genuinely believe that they would get high marks. I only have two minor suggestions for editing. I would recommend that they put the "history" section above their "memory-based" explanation section. The history section was much more concise and gave better content for the rest of the article. I would also suggest maybe separating the large "memory-based" explanation section into multiple slightly smaller sections. This will help make it an easier article to read and browse.