User:Tia UH/Partulina redfieldi/Porkhash808 Peer Review

General info

 * Tia UH
 * User:Tia UH/Partulina redfieldi
 * Partulina redfieldi:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? I liked the reference list and it's organization.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) Yes the article only talks about the species.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? Yes because they speak about what is being talked about.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Yes everything relates to the title.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes because they all have a source attached.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The sources are great and contain a good amount of information about the species.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? Add more words to the description that talk about their size.
 * 15) * Comment: this is a good idea, I will look for this information!
 * 16) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Yes but it needs pictures.
 * 17) * Comment: This would enhance the article! Pictures will be added to it but not by me.
 * 18) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Possibly bold words for the audience to see what is most important.
 * 19) * Comment: yes this would be good in lengthy articles with many parts. However I will not be doing this as the article is short, and all the information can be easily found with a few sentences in each (3) section.
 * 20) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I can add a section about the population of the species.