User:Tifego/evidence

Sockpuppets or alternate usernames of :

909er is UCRGrad
I strongly suspect that 909er is a sockpuppet of UCRGrad, created for the purpose of helping UCRGrad push his POV on the article University of California, Riverside, which is in violation of a Wikipedia policy on sockpuppets, and somewhat disruptive.

Here are my reasons for suspecting he's a sockpuppet: In other words, 909er matches most of the characteristics of sock puppets, and supports the same views (controversially negative about this one university) as UCRGrad. <!--
 * 1) 909er made his very first edit merely 21 minutes after UCRGrad's 3RR block wore off. |UCRGrad
 * 2) 909er's first edit was to insert additional description of racial hate crimes in surrounding areas, immediately after UCRGrad lost a debate (because of no concensus) on being able to do that same thing (which is what UCRGrad got that 3RR block for).
 * 3) 909er removed many citeneeded tags that had been placed after additions that UCRGrad had made (and/or additions he had repeatedly defended from deletion in the past).
 * 4) When 909er's changes were reverted by someone else, UCRGrad restored all of those changes.
 * 5) Some suspiciously similar edits with identical formatting peculiarities.
 * 6) 909er words his edit summaries (and talking) in a peculiar manner with stuff like "yo", "yoyoyo" and "extraneous" mixed in, suggesting it is done to purposely appear to behave differently from the sockpuppeteer.
 * 7) 909er has a tendency to put his comments in all bold text, as does UCRGrad.
 * 8) 909er has edited only the University of California, Riverside article. Not only is this highly unusual behavior for a non-sockpuppet new user to follow, but it is exactly the same behavior as UCRGrad, who also edits only University of California, Riverside. (Also, neither user has bothered to create a user page, not that it means a lot.)

HisBundleAblation is UCRGrad
This seems to be a throwaway account of UCRGrad, created for the same purpose as 909er.


 * 1) The manner of speaking is displaced from UCRGrad's own in an equal and opposite direction from 909er's.
 * 2) He appeared on the same day as 909er, making his first post directly under 909er's on the talk page of the same article. (note: It was more than 9 hours since the talk page had been edited and more than 30 minutes since the article had been edited, so he probably couldn't have found it through Recent Changes. And, from his first post, he was supposedly unfamiliar with the article or its talk page.)
 * 3) Not only did he express the same view as UCRGrad, but he also used the same reasoning (or lack thereof: skirting the actual issue and instead making a very broad statement used to support that one specific inclusion).
 * 4) That is the only issue he addressed, although that talk page is full of other unresolved issues (and indeed Wikipedia is full of other articles), he picked out and addressed only that one.
 * 5) He made a few spelling/word choice errors that I doubt someone who really types like that would actually make, so at the very least he seems to be attempting to behave unlike himself.

UnblockingTau is UCRGrad?
This account seems to be created by UCRGrad for the same purposes as 909er, and to insult several other users.


 * 1) UnblockingTau was registered on the same day that I posted about 909er and HisBundleAblation being sockpuppets of UCRGrad.
 * 2) UnblockingTau's first edit was to personally attack me without provocation about 45 minutes after I had replied  to UCRGrad's personal attack of me . Also, both of those insulting statements are similar in the sense that they don't logically follow from the context. I wasn't bringing anything up, nor was I really involved in the previous conversation, and nothing in the preceding discussion would logically lead anyone to suddenly say what UnblockingTau did.
 * 3) The attacks also fit into how UCRGrad has been increasingly insulting to me, for instance, before that was "To Tifego ... instead of complaining about bias, this and that, blah blah ... There's no need to whine and make retarded accusations." I don't see any complaints of bias he could have been responding to there, and the only accusation I had made was of his sockpuppetry of 909er (which is an accusation he did not deny).
 * 4) Compare the edit summary of this reversion by UCRGrad to the last sentence in this explanation by UnblockingTau of this reversion by UnblockingTau. Note especially the style of sprinkling ALL CAPS here and there on things he'd like to emphasize, besides the similar argument.
 * 5) Both usernames are quick to make similarly direct accusations of "their" opponents being biased. last sentence of this, last item of this, second part of #7 in this.
 * 6) Both usernames make accusations of ignorance. first and last sentence of this by UCRGrad, all of this by UnblockingTau.
 * 7) The behavior, expression of mood, and methods of argument are similar.

note: 141.214.17.5 recently added something to one of UnblockingTau's comments. This doesn't necessarily mean anything, but it's hard to be sure what's really going on here (in the absense of a completed CheckUser). -->

71.198.58.193 is UCRGrad
Besides behaving apparently identically to UCRGrad, 71.198.58.193 has signed as UCRGrad on some of his posts.

(here for completeness)