User:Tiff592/Nanoelectrochemistry/Thebluecardigan Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tiff592


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tiff592/Nanoelectrochemistry
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nanoelectrochemistry

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

- The lead is not updated yet, but adding in the potential applications of nanoelectrochemistry and expanding on them could improve it.

- There is no bias with the writing. However, the writing can seem informal. For example, "nanoparticle is currently the hottest technology for CO2 reduction," consider replacing "hottest." You could say, "Using nanoparticles for CO2 reduction is currently an active field." Also, remember that the writing should be in third person.

- There are some run-on sentences and minor grammatical errors. Try splitting up the sentence or cutting down on dead weight words.

- For the battery application paragraph, add some more sources to give a broader sense of the field. The sources do seem reliable and the links work.

- The diagram is quite helpful for understanding the electrocatalytic system and is captioned well.

- Also, remember to add your sources to the bibliography page.