User:Tiffany Ong/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: (link)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * Yes
 * 4) * No
 * 5) * Concise
 * 6) Automated Driving System
 * 7) * Yes
 * 8) * Yes
 * 9) * No
 * 10) * Concise
 * 11) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 12) * Yes
 * 13) * Yes
 * 14) * No
 * 15) * Concise


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * Yes since 2004 - 2019
 * 4) * No
 * 5) Automated Driving System
 * 6) * Yes
 * 7) * Yes, 2020 references
 * 8) * No
 * 9) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 10) * Yes
 * 11) * Yes, 2020 references
 * 12) * No


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * No
 * 4) * No
 * 5) * No
 * 6) Automated Driving System
 * 7) * Yes
 * 8) * No
 * 9) * Yes, only stating success
 * 10) * No
 * 11) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 12) * Yes
 * 13) * No
 * 14) * No
 * 15) * No


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * Yes
 * 4) * Yes
 * 5) * Yes
 * 6) Automated Driving System
 * 7) * Yes
 * 8) * Yes
 * 9) * Yes
 * 10) * Yes
 * 11) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 12) * Yes
 * 13) * Yes
 * 14) * Yes
 * 15) * Yes


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * Yes
 * 4) * Yes
 * 5) Automated Driving System
 * 6) * Yes
 * 7) * Yes
 * 8) * Yes
 * 9) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 10) * Yes
 * 11) * Yes
 * 12) * Yes


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Yes
 * 3) * Yes
 * 4) * Yes
 * 5) * Yes
 * 6) Automated Driving System
 * 7) * Yes
 * 8) * Yes
 * 9) * Yes
 * 10) * Yes
 * 11) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 12) * Yes
 * 13) * Yes
 * 14) * Yes
 * 15) * Yes


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Most of them are giving critiques to one editor to another
 * 3) * C-Rated, yes it is related to 8 WikiProjects
 * 4) * It is just fact based rather than opinionated
 * 5) Automated Driving System
 * 6) * There is only one edit made to the talk page
 * 7) * Start-Class/Low-Importance, yes it is related to 3 WikiProjects
 * 8) * It is just fact based rather than opinionated
 * 9) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 10) * Most of them are giving updates about what each editor changed or added in the article
 * 11) * Start-Class/Low-Importance, yes it is related to 2 WikiProjects
 * 12) * It is just fact based rather than opinionated


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * 1) Self-Driving Car
 * 2) * Very complete
 * 3) * Detailed information and good use of pictures
 * 4) * It already has very little space for improvements
 * 5) * Very well developed
 * 6) Automated Driving System
 * 7) * Need improvement
 * 8) * Concise and interesting lead
 * 9) * Adding more information
 * 10) * underdeveloped
 * 11) Advanced drive-assistance system
 * 12) * Need improvement
 * 13) * Concise and interesting lead
 * 14) * Adding more information and making better structure
 * 15) * underdeveloped


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * How can the article be improved?
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: