User:Tiffanylujan/Heterotrophic picoplankton/Rwaggoner8 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tiffanylujan - Heterotrophic Picoplankton


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Tiffanylujan/Heterotrophic picoplankton


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Heterotrophic picoplankton

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think that the background you have for the heterotrophic picoplankton is a good start, especially since the main article page you are working off of has so little information about it. Coming from a background that is not biology, adding any information that explains the basics of heterotrophic picoplankton would be helpful. Like having a quick sentence explaining what heterotrophic is and then what picoplankton is. I think it will help better develop your article, especially for readers with no biology background, since the original one has such limited info about it. Adding sentences that explain why the higher growth rate is important on the aquatic food web will help the flow and understanding also, along with sentences that explain the rest of the topics in the present sentences. I think it would help the flow of the whole article and give more information, so that it doesn’t jump from one topic to another, but instead ties them all together. I think everything else looks great, especially once you have all your needed sources, and all of your links work!

I'm also not sure how the bibliography is supposed to be formatted, but don't forget to upload your references on that page too.