User:Tikey105!/Mean world syndrome/Adg21a Peer Review

Amanda Golson Peer Review Article 1

I liked the additions in the first section to include the media relevancy and modern impact that mean world syndrome has. You mentioned the early stages of research but I think a citation or link to whomever this research was conducted by would be beneficial and give your contributions more legitimacy.

I liked the section about doom scrolling and think it could be in its own section separate from the COVID section. I liked how you included a relevant study with sources which allowed me to learn more about the topic overall. But I would have liked to know who the study was conducted by on first glance.

I saw the heading "Evolution of Mass Media" in the original article and think you could expand on that further. Perhaps include an example for the major types of media mentioned. This will give your contributions more depth and allow the reader to relate to something they know.

I think other graphs/pictures/visuals could be added to make the page more visually appealing overall. I think you are on the right track but there is still a lot of room for progress. Im curious if there is an opposite of doom scrolling or Mean world syndrome that would be interesting to include a section or link. This could help your reader understand both sides and the actions involved in each.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)