User:Tillman/Plimer revs & adds

Revisions and additions needed
1. Lead in "Scientific reactions" section: I question whether Monbiot is a good choice for the lead.
 * He's not a scientist.
 * He's a strongly partisan pro-warmer, notable for stating that "flying across the Atlantic is as unacceptable, in terms of its impact on human well-being, as child abuse." (source: George Monbiot)

I strongly recommend replacing Monbiot with a (critical) scientist.

2. I question whether "The response of scientists and academics to the book was overwhelmingly negative." We have a number of positive reactions on the talk page from scientists and academics that haven't been used in the article, mostly because of RS concerns. Generally negative is a more neutral and accurate description, imo.

3. Political affiliations of reviewers/commentators: Among Plimer's supporters, our article has such comments as "predominately conservative publications", "right-wing columnist", and "a staunch supporter of the mining industry". If there are such descriptions of Plimer's critics, I missed them, although many are left-wing and/or warmer partisans. I don't think any such labels are appropriate here.