User:Tim Kruper/sandbox

Article Evaluation: The Dark Triad
This article has largely relevant topics. Perhaps the most distracting thing in the reading is the labeling of "Perspectives" to describe aspects such as the workplace, internet trolls, etc. This seems to be simply a miscellaneous categorization, and the target of my most significant recommendation is either relabeling this section or moving these subsections. However, the subheadings are generally of equal length, contain numerous citations, and cover the educationally relevant aspects of the dark triad (origins, features, and related concepts). The article maintains a neutral tone and scientific/psychological viewpoint throughout, and the citations that I tried were actively linked to reliable sources. Many similar concepts were shared between this article and in-class lectures (e.g. validity and reliability). While a majority of the sources are recent, some as new as 2020, there were a few dating back as far as 1985, which, in some cases is cause for concern (or at least an update). The talk page of the article is surprisingly helpful; one author mentioned a potential issue with the paper that I initially missed; room for a US-centric-bias in the last section. Other editors were brief and objective, offering other sources for improvement. The article is rated "C" and "mid-importance," and is a part of the Psychology and Medicine WikiProjects. We haven't covered this topic in class as in depth as this article does, but there is a general consensus between the two.

Dark triad