User:Timtrent/PROD log/Archives/2023

{{Automatic archive navigator

August 2013

 * 1) Hackpacking: PROD; notified  20:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Non notable neologism. Perhaps Wiktionary would be appropriate. Not Wikipedia, please.
 * 3) Jane Ash Poitras: PROD; notified  06:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: This article shows that the lady exists, but does not assert any notability for her. The references verify her existence and the fact that she is an artist. There are a great many artists who exist, are not notable, and whose basic facts of existence and being an artist are verifiable. Without notability she may not remain here.
 * 5) Humanities Circle: International Journal of Central University of Kerala: PROD; notified  08:09, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Please do more than verify the existence if this journal. There are many journals. This article needs to assert the notability of the journal and verify that notability. Wikipedia is not a directory of journals. It requires higher standards.
 * 7) Fluid dynamic generator: PROD; notified  17:29, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: No context, no assertion of notability, no references, and all original research
 * 9) Dungeon management game: PROD; notified  11:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: This article does not assert the notability of the game, nor does it have any references in reliable sources. Without these it does not meet the generally accepted quality threshold here and should be deleted. With them it may qualify to remain.
 * 11) Scott Wild: BLP PROD; notified  16:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) Death of Christopher Lane: PROD; notified  16:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) * Reason: I hesitate to propose this for deletion, but it is unpleasant rather than notable. I fear that drive by killings happen all the time. They do make the news, but, unless significant for other reasons, then they fade away as unremarkable, but unpleasant, incidents. WP:NOTNEWS applies. We are sad for those who knew and were affected by the dead young man, but this cannot be an article here unless his death is otherwise notable than being just another drive by killing.
 * 14) Munnai Singh: PROD; notified  16:59, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) * Reason: This is an essay and original research, not a Wikipedia article.
 * 16) Personalized advertising: PROD; notified  23:25, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * Reason: This is an essay and pure original research. It is a perfectly reasonable blog article. As such it has no place on Wikipedia
 * 18) Elaine West: BLP PROD; notified  23:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) The band project: PROD; notified  10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) * Reason: There is insufficient context to know the location, and there is no notability asserted nor any references. Without these things the article may not remain here.
 * 21) Russian-British Cultural Association: PROD; notified  11:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) * Reason: There is limited notability asserted in this article, probably insufficient to pass WP:GNG. There are no references. Without these the article may not remain here. Even with them it must pass WP:GNG if it is to remain.
 * 23) Nigerian FMCG Exports To ECOWAS: PROD; notified  12:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) * Reason: This is pure original research unhampered by references, and not even notable. It makes a great blog post, but is unacceptable as a Wikipedia article.
 * 25) Lattice Compatibility Theory: PROD; notified  12:50, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * Reason: Unreferenced original research.
 * 27) International Civil Society Centre: PROD; notified  13:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) * Reason: There is no assertion of notability sufficient for this to remain, nor are there any references. With them it stands a chance, without them it must go
 * 29) Sardinian Literary Spring: PROD; notified  08:13, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) * Reason: At present this is an essay and conjecture. It has no valid references, preferring instead to make wikilinks appear to be references. There is also not notability asserted for the term.
 * 31) Chloe Daniels: BLP PROD; notified  12:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) Shudhu Tumi: PROD; notified  12:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) * Reason: notability is not asserted. No verification in reliable sources exists. Without these it may not remain here.
 * 34) Prinsesa ng Masa: PROD; notified  12:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) * Reason: There can be no notability because the series only starts to screen in late September 2013. Wait until notability is present and re-create the article then.
 * 36) Aaron Woodley: BLP PROD; notified  12:47, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) Product of n terms of gp: PROD; notified  13:04, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) * Reason: This needs context and the assertion of notability pluse verification in reliable sources or it may not remain here
 * 39) Association of the European Self-Medication Industry (AESGP): PROD; notified  13:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 40) * Reason: It looks notable, but notabilty is neither asserted nor verified in this article. This must be corrected for the article to remain here.
 * 41) ECG(Edalo Cheragani Guruthulu) (film): PROD; notified  16:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 42) * Reason: This movie asserts no notability, nor has it any verification. Youtube is not a reliable source
 * 43) CyberCrimeClinic: PROD; notified  18:36, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 44) * Reason: No, it will not. This is original research and must go.
 * 45) Todd Kauffman: BLP PROD; notified  18:46, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 46) Ten Most Wanted 2013: PROD; notified  18:59, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 47) * Reason: Pure original research
 * 48) Supermom: PROD; notified  19:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 49) * Reason: Undocumented DicDef. For Wiktionary, surely?
 * 50) Joanna Ruiz: BLP PROD; notified  11:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 51) Mike Sabath: BLP PROD; notified  21:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 52) Augustine Abbey (Idikoko): BLP PROD; notified  21:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 53) Dan Tyler Moore (Author): BLP PROD; notified  17:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 54) Center of Military Chaplaincy: PROD; notified  10:58, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 55) * Reason: This is an essay. No notability is asserted, though it feels notable. With a rewrite and references this can become a valid article, but, in its present form, is not acceptable.
 * 56) Jäävalo: BLP PROD; notified  11:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 57) Manni Sandhu: BLP PROD; notified  13:18, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 58) Benoit Seguin: PROD; notified  21:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 59) * Reason: I am failing to see a clear pass of WP:ACADEMIC for this person. Associate professorship tends not to be sufficient of itself and his other achievements do not seem to clear the WP:GNG hurdle.
 * 60) Pond5: PROD; notified  09:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 61) * Reason: While notability is asserted it is not verified
 * 62) Weng's Cold Storage Industrial Company ammonia leak: PROD; notified  19:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 63) * Reason: WP:NOTNEWS
 * 64) Areatime: PROD; notified  21:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 65) * Reason: Promotion of research project that is, so far not notable
 * 66) Citrus Crossing: PROD; notified  21:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 67) * Reason: This article, short as it is, meanders. Citrus crossing now appears to be a shopping mall where students live, with a theatre surrounded by other stuff. Non notable, and confused, with no references

September 2013

 * 1) Stella (Over the Hedge): PROD; notified  11:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Animated characters can't be notable, surely?
 * 3) Corballis: PROD; notified  12:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: The article shows a pretty standard Professor. Nothing in it demonstrates that he meets the criteria in WP:ACADEMIC, however. Without this it is unlikely that this article may remain here.
 * 5) Michael Corballis: PROD; notified  12:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: The article shows a pretty standard Professor. Nothing in it demonstrates that he meets the criteria in WP:ACADEMIC, however. Without this it is unlikely that this article may remain here.
 * 7) Ethan Drogin: BLP PROD; notified  16:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) Syed Masood Hashmi: BLP PROD; notified  11:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) كتاب الباقيات الصالحات: PROD; notified  12:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: Unless true notability is established and asserted in this article and verified in reliable sources, this article may not remain here.
 * 11) Jayavani: BLP PROD; notified  20:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) Ed Askew: BLP PROD; notified  12:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) Wojciech Lemański: PROD; notified  12:24, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Notable for one event only, though the criticism of anti-semitism and child abuse may just allow him to pass as inherently notable if built on and cited in reliable sources. At present there is insufficient notability asserted and verified in the article.
 * 15) Kathryn Hamm: PROD; notified  16:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) * Reason: It has references, so passes the criteria for BLPPROD, and it asserts some notability (passing CSD), though not enough to remain here. At present it is an unhappy mix of personal and corporate material. If the lady is notable her article needs to state it. If her corporation is notable it requires its own article. This article nether asserts sufficient notability nor verifies it sufficiently for an article here.
 * 17) Sohel Rana (actor): BLP PROD; notified  16:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 18) QubitTV: PROD; notified  20:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) * Reason: Ignoring the imperfect citation parameters, presumably awaiting translation from Spanish, this article fails to assert notability for the organisation. Without that it can not remain here. I've chosen the PROD mechanism to try to give editors time to assert and verify notability in reliable sources, but other deletion mechanisms exist and may take precedence.
 * 20) Adam Lawrence: PROD; notified  10:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) * Reason: While the Royal Mint obviously has a chief executive, notability is not inherited by the postholder. This gentleman has no inherent personal notability.
 * 22) Abhay Shukla: BLP PROD; notified  10:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) Andrew Brenner (writer): PROD; notified  10:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) * Reason: One does not have inherent notability by doing one's job as a writer for a TV show
 * 25) Andrew Brenner (writer): BLP PROD; notified  11:50, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) Ahmedabad-Viramgam section: PROD; notified  10:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) * Reason: There is insufficient context at present to let the average reader understand what this is. It is notable, presumably, but may be better as a part of the parent article of which it is stated to be "a part" if such an article exists. IT requires references in reliable sources or it may not remain here as an article.
 * 28) Daniel Smales: BLP PROD; notified  13:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) Sekou Nkrumah: BLP PROD; notified  15:15, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) SERESC: PROD; notified  21:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) * Reason: At present we see a $7m budget organisation, not small, not enormous, and we see many primary sources. What we don't see is an assertion of notability which is verified in reliable sources. WIthout these essential items the article, while interesting, should not remain here.
 * 32) Bharti Kumar: BLP PROD; notified  19:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) Aryan's club: PROD; notified  19:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 34) * Reason: While notbaility is asserted, it is not verified.
 * 35) Oliver Wade: BLP PROD; notified  19:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 36) Autocoding: PROD; notified  10:09, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) * Reason: While presumably a notable topic, this article fails to assert the notability and to verify it in reliable sources. This means it is presented as original research and thus may not remain here. Correcting those issues, may not ensure that it remains but will increase the probability the better it gets.
 * 38) Shangrila T-Shirt: PROD; notified  10:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) * Reason: Some notability is asserted, but there is no verification in reliable sources. Verification must be present or the article has no place here, and simply looks like an advert.
 * 40) Kira Tozer: BLP PROD; notified  10:54, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 41) Alfred Zappala: BLP PROD; notified  10:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 42) Reba Toney: BLP PROD; notified  19:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 43) Anthony (Tony) Charles Thorne: BLP PROD; notified  12:53, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 44) Iván Sánchez (actor): BLP PROD; notified  14:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 45) Ruth Fine: PROD; notified  10:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 46) * Reason: Fails WP:ACADEMIC
 * 47) Anna Sarah Kugler: PROD; notified  10:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 48) * Reason: Many people are the First Something. That does not make them notable. No full notability is asserted and verifiec in reliable sources, which may be paper sources, naturally. Without this material the article may not remain here.
 * 49) Mark Springer - Artist, Musician: BLP PROD; notified  11:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 50) Young People Matter: PROD; notified  21:39, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 51) * Reason: While there is a strong possibility that this is a notable organisation, the article fails to assert its notability, and does not verify it in reliable sources. Without these items it may not remain here. It is not notable simply because it is a charity and does good works.
 * 52) Wonder Valley: PROD; notified  22:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 53) * Reason: No notability asserted or verified
 * 54) Omar Robau: BLP PROD; notified  08:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 55) Ovako: PROD; notified  09:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 56) * Reason: That the company exists is not in doubt, but the article asserts no notability and the only references are not in reliable sources. If these matters are not corrected then the article has no place here.
 * 57) Meghnad Saha Hall of Residence: PROD; notified  10:33, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 58) * Reason: Some notability is asserted, but none is verified. Halls of residence generally should be a part of the academic institution they are a hall for, assuming that is what this is. But the article doesn't explain this in any meaningful manner.
 * 59) AMSM: PROD; notified  10:56, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 60) * Reason: Seriously confusing article, 90% sure it should be redirected to IRU. IT appears to have no place as a freestanding article
 * 61) The house on the lake: PROD; notified  11:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 62) * Reason: Non notable vocal recording
 * 63) An Example for Information Processing Cycle: PROD; notified  14:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 64) * Reason: Pure WP:OR. This is for a blog, or submission for school, not for Wikipedia
 * 65) Bruce Fernie: PROD; notified  09:46, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 66) * Reason: While there is sufficient referencing and assertion of notability to avoid speedy deletion or WP:BLPPROD, this article does not assert sufficient notability to ensure its place here. Without this it may not remain.
 * 67) Medieoperatørene: PROD; notified  10:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 68) * Reason: I looked at no:Medieoperatørene, but found no useful additional material. There are no references in reliable sources to back the limited assertion of notability either here or there. For a TV production house with this number of credits that is a sad lack. It appears that it is notable, but the rules are clear. Notability must be asserted and verified in reliable sources for an article to remain here. The great swathe of redlinks militates against this being notable, certainly yet, in the English language Wikipedia.
 * 69) Maldini Pali: BLP PROD; notified  10:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 70) Italian Apocalyptic Cult "Rosary Prayer Group”: PROD; notified  12:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 71) * Reason: A morass of WP:POV and WP:OR and not a little WP:SYNTH this article needs a brutal edit to see the wood form the trees to even discern whether it is notable. At present it requires WP:TNT
 * 72) Abhijit Pawar: PROD; notified  14:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 73) * Reason: Passes BLPPROD, just notable enough to pass CSD, but insufficient notability asserted and Verified to remain.
 * 74) Chalaque (band): PROD; notified  07:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 75) * Reason: Lacks asserted notability together with references in reliable sources. Asserts just sufficient notability to avoid speedy deletion, but insufficient to remain.
 * 76) Accenti Magazine: PROD; notified  18:21, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 77) * Reason: That something exists does not make it notable, and no notability has been asserted, nor has it been verified in reliable sources. Without these items it may not remain here as an article.
 * 78) Cathy pill: BLP PROD; notified  13:10, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 79) POP's And POP Convention: PROD; notified  13:13, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 80) * Reason: Pure original research, which, wile interesting and informative, is an essay, and not suitable for WIkipedia.
 * 81) Global warming and climate change: PROD; notified  13:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 82) * Reason: This adds nothing to the many and major articles here on climate change, and is an opinion piece, an essay and pureoriginal research. As such it is not a valid item for Wikipedia despite being interesting and informative. If points are missing form the other articles then they may be and should be added there.
 * 83) Sahil Khan (TV actor): BLP PROD; notified  13:37, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 84) ADESS-02: PROD; notified  13:48, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 85) * Reason: Interesting? Yes. Notable? No. When it becomes notable then it may have its article here. Currently this is just too soon.
 * 86) Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz bin Turki Al Saud: BLP PROD; notified  13:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 87) Social media and media magement: PROD; notified  13:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 88) * Reason: A very pleasant incomplete essay, but Original research through and through. Even if sourced it is unlikely to pass muster here.
 * 89) Media management and global media: PROD; notified  13:30, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 90) * Reason: Pure WP:OR and an essay. Not for wikipedia.
 * 91) 7 steps to make a perfect media plan.: PROD; notified  13:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 92) * Reason: WP:NOTESSAY, pure original research, suitable for a blogging platform, but not an article for Wikipedia.
 * 93) Media Buying Calculations: PROD; notified  13:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 94) * Reason: WP:NOTESSAY, pure original research, suitable for a blogging platform, but not an article for Wikipedia.
 * 95) Malena Morgan: BLP PROD; notified  15:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 96) Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman bin Mohammad Al Saud: BLP PROD; notified  16:30, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 97) CRAX File Manager: PROD; notified  16:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 98) * Reason: It exists, yes, but it has nothing notable about it, nor does it have any references in reliable sources. WP:NOTDIRECTORY applies
 * 99) James Griffin (screenwriter): BLP PROD; notified  21:59, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 100) Rachel Lang (screenwriter): BLP PROD; notified  22:00, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 101) Eve Gordon (NZ actress): BLP PROD; notified  22:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 102) Colleen Davis: BLP PROD; notified  22:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 103) Rachel Nash: BLP PROD; notified  22:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 104) Ben Barrington: BLP PROD; notified  22:02, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 105) Fern Sutherland: BLP PROD; notified  22:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 106) Roz Turnbull: BLP PROD; notified  22:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 107) Hayden Frost: BLP PROD; notified  22:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 108) Matthew Saville (actor): BLP PROD; notified  22:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 109) Ministries of Djibouti: PROD; notified  22:20, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 110) * Reason: Not entirely sure that this list, full of redlinks and other links to generic ministries, adds value either to Wikipedia or to Djibouti.
 * 111) Role of a media buyer: PROD; notified  10:27, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 112) * Reason: Although referenced to a limited extent, this is an essay, not an encyclopaedia article. It is a mixture of sourced material and pure WP:OR
 * 113) Media planning and buying agency: PROD; notified  10:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 114) * Reason: This is little more than an extended Dictionary Definition, and somewhat of an essay, albeit with references. Much is padding to seek to make it an article. However there is no place on Wikipedia for dictionary definitions.
 * 115) Media buying cost: PROD; notified  10:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 116) * Reason: This is little more than an extended Dictionary Definition, and somewhat of an essay, albeit with references. Much is padding to seek to make it an article. However there is no place on Wikipedia for dictionary definitions.
 * 117) High-Speed Management Communication Theory: PROD; notified  10:33, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 118) * Reason: Pure original research, albeit with a list of references
 * 119) Health care public relations: PROD; notified  11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 120) * Reason: Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
 * 121) Financial public relations: PROD; notified  11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 122) * Reason: Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
 * 123) Barriers of corporate communications: PROD; notified  11:30, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 124) * Reason: Pure Oroginal research even with a reference list. It also smells like a copyright violation
 * 125) The Structures of a Media Agency: PROD; notified  11:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 126) * Reason: Pure WP:OR
 * 127) MM effective communication in an organization: PROD; notified  14:08, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 128) * Reason: Despite a list of references this is WP:OR and an essay
 * 129) MM Digital media & it's effectiveness on media management.: PROD; notified  14:09, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 130) * Reason: Despite a list of references this is WP:OR and an essay
 * 131) Private sector evolution in India: PROD; notified  14:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 132) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay with a list of references. Looks like coursework, or potential copyvio
 * 133) Client agency relationship in private sector: PROD; notified  14:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 134) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay with a list of references. Looks like coursework, or potential copyvio
 * 135) Social media as a communication tool in agencies: PROD; notified  14:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 136) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay with a list of references. Looks like coursework, or potential copyvio

October 2013
The article itself is poor, covering pretty much only the fact that Renouf and Middleton exist. Evidence of this is that Renouf has exhibited in galleries, as have many artists of varying reputations, but there is no discussion of her work and style and technique by others. It relies on primary sources, the exhibition catalogues themselves, which contain puffery written either by the exhibitors or their agents. It should be deleted as an advert. It meets all the criteria for WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT and complete WP:COI as it is at present. If it is to remain it requires application of WP:TNT, hence this nomination for deletion
 * 1) Fils Tunechi Director: BLP PROD; notified  09:09, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Breath therapy: PROD; notified  10:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: Some sort of WP:OR essay. Great for a blog, lacks WP:N for Wikipedia
 * 4) Logainmníocht na Gaeilge i gCill Airne: PROD; notified  14:14, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: Pure original research and an essay. Not for Wikipedia
 * 6) Process window: PROD; notified  14:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: Pure WP:OR and an essay. Either to be salvaged with relevant context and citations or to be deleted.
 * 8) Mélanie Joly: BLP PROD; notified  16:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) Prince Of Patiala: endorsed PROD. 19:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) Essential Magic Conference: PROD; notified  23:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * Reason: A specialist conference reported by a specialist magazine specialising in that specialism does not mean this is a notable conference, which is definitely appears not to be. Being magic that may be an illusion, but it does it very well. So well, in fact, that the conference fails WP:GNG and has no place here.
 * 12) Rezaya: BLP PROD; notified  09:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) Olivia Tilley: BLP PROD; notified  09:41, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) London Ishq (2014 film): PROD; notified  09:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) * Reason: Confused article about a film that has yet to see the light of day, alleged to be released in December 2014. No valid references and no notability. The article is not even self consistent about the length of the film. When the film is notable it may have an article here, but not before then. Speculative articles promoting films are not acceptable.
 * 16) Manoj sharma: BLP PROD; notified  10:26, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) Rick Prosser: BLP PROD; notified  10:36, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 18) Wireless charging of smartphone by antennas: PROD; notified  13:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) * Reason: Pure original research and an essay. This should be placed on a blog. Not for Wikipedia.
 * 20) John Sevargo: BLP PROD; notified  15:48, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) Sabali: Mythical Transformations of Social Trauma: PROD; notified  15:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) * Reason: Pure original research even with references.
 * 23) Harald Wydra: PROD; notified  16:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) * Reason: As it stands the article does not demonstrate how he passes WP:GNG nor WP:ACADEMIC.
 * 25) Michael Laide: BLP PROD; notified  22:35, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) Serge Sharrinovsky: BLP PROD; notified  10:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) Rajini Krishnan 67: BLP PROD; notified  12:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) Kaare Ørnung: PROD; notified  23:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) * Reason: Would the gentleman have been notable enough for an article here before his death? He doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable post mortem, and references do not leap into view online. Are there non online sources that affirm his notability? If not I fear the article should go.
 * 30) IMT kharkhoda: PROD; notified  12:46, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) * Reason: This describes something in the future. WP:BALL applies. When and if this project happens and achieves notability it may have an article here. Not until then, please.
 * 32) Ortoperspekta: PROD; notified  12:52, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) * Reason: The article lacks references. There is no way of knowing is this is notable from the facts given.
 * 34) فخر کوہ سلیمان و دامان، چیف آف تمن قیصرانی سردار میربادشاہ خان قیصرانی: BLP PROD; notified  13:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) Celso Grebogi: BLP PROD; notified  16:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 36) Kenya Lynem Metaphysician: BLP PROD; notified  16:52, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) Campaign for Socialism Group: PROD; notified  22:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) * Reason: Flagged as unsourced since August 2007 we know the organisation exists (0.9 probability), but we do not know from the article that it is notable, and there are no references to show it. Further, it is outdated, thus unlikely to be an accurate reflection of the current status. It also quotes a large tract of text stated to have been issued by the organisation itself and thus is likely to be a Copyright violation. The article would probably benefit from a ground up rewrite if the organisation is sufficiently notable for a place here.
 * 39) Rich Nice: BLP PROD; notified  21:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 40) Gordon "Comissioner Gordon" Williams: BLP PROD; notified  21:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 41) Tagore Trajano: BLP PROD; notified  21:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 42) Khanjani bhajana: PROD; notified  21:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 43) * Reason: Unreferenced and no indication of notability. Give it those and it may remain.
 * 44) Syed Fazaluddin: BLP PROD; notified  08:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 45) Susy Records: PROD; notified  11:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 46) * Reason: This article has no references to support itself, nor does the corporation itself appear to have the notability required to remain here
 * 47) Standard-setting: PROD; notified  13:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 48) * Reason: An intriguingly vague essay consisting of verbiage interspersed with some references. It appears to be WP:OR
 * 49) Cutscore: PROD; notified  13:21, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 50) * Reason: Non notable subtopic of a non notable essay.
 * 51) Devvon Terrell: PROD; notified  08:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 52) * Reason: It is not simply having references that allows an article to remain here. The article must also show the subject's notability, and this one does not. Currently fails WP:GNG.
 * 53) Edb to pst: PROD; notified  09:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 54) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a "how to" guide
 * 55) Laurel Coppock: PROD; notified  08:38, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 56) * Reason: I'm having trouble seeing this lady as more than just a jobbing actress who is below the WP:GNG threshold for inclusion here. The lead shows no reason for inclusion, nor does the main body of text. Without any extra information I cannot see the value to WIkipedia of this article remaining.
 * 57) Andrybosk: BLP PROD; notified  09:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 58) Amitosh Nagpal: BLP PROD; notified  09:18, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 59) Shobhan Sarkar: BLP PROD; notified  09:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 60) Topshe: PROD; notified  09:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 61) * Reason: Unreferenced text with no validation that the character even exists.
 * 62) Cheri Knight: BLP PROD; notified  09:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 63) Mohan Vaidya: BLP PROD; notified  09:23, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 64) List of Schuhplattler organizations: PROD; notified  09:43, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 65) * Reason: Every link an external link. WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:LINKFARM apply, however good the intentions of providing the information.
 * 66) David Technical Institute: PROD; notified  10:58, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 67) * Reason: This organisation fails to establish notability and has no references in reliable sources. An organisation fo 40+ years standing ought to have made some impression in, eg, Google, but I can find nothing so far. Without references this article may not remain here.
 * 68) David Koonce: PROD; notified  20:26, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 69) * Reason: Really not individually notable.
 * 70) Vishnu Narayan: BLP PROD; notified  13:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 71) Khalil Jalili: BLP PROD; notified  14:47, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 72) Joe Greenwell: PROD; notified  20:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 73) * Reason: All well and good, but this doesn't make him pass WP:GNG
 * 74) Sarah Davison: BLP PROD; notified  12:09, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 75) Iain Lauchlan: BLP PROD; notified  12:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 76) Alison Behnke: PROD; notified  12:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 77) * Reason: As presented in this article the claim of notability is not correctly verified in reliable sources. Without this verification the article may not remain here.
 * 78) Sumedh Mudgalkar: BLP PROD; notified  14:12, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 79) Noémi Makra: BLP PROD; notified  16:07, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 80) Electronic Designer for Handloom: PROD; notified  16:18, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 81) * Reason: Pure WP:OR. Great for a blog, not for Wikipedia.
 * 82) Edda Renouf: PROD; notified  09:32, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 83) * Reason: Having worked in and analysed this article, while wishing it were not so, I see it as a huge and cleverly constructed piece of self advertisement for Renouf and her husband the musician, crafted as self promotion by Renouf herself, against strong advice on her talk page.
 * 1) (Retiree): PROD; notified  10:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: At best this is a dictionary definition, better suited for Wiktionary.
 * 3) Free world radio: PROD; notified  13:05, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: When this is up and running it may become notable. Until then it is an idea, and not a Wikipedia article
 * 5) Talk TV Global: PROD; notified  13:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: The aims of the organisation seem laudable, but there is nothing int he article to show its notability, nor are there any references. Without these the article may not remain here.
 * 7) Brevitas: PROD; notified  16:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: WP:OR, an essay and a Dictionary Definition. This is for Wiktionary, not Wikipedia
 * 9) James Barney Foundation: PROD; notified  09:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: The intent of the foundation is laudable, but good intentions do not justify an article. However the article contains no references. nor does it make the notability of the organisation clear. Without these items the article may not remain here
 * 11) Visioncomic: PROD; notified  09:54, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: Uncited oroginal research
 * 13) Chemical tower packing: PROD; notified  10:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Pure WP:OR
 * 15) Lewis hilliard: BLP PROD; notified  10:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) Fragile test: PROD; notified  15:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * Reason: Somewhat incomprehensible article that an essay, and pure WP:OR, despite a reference.
 * 18) Prateek Jain: BLP PROD; notified  12:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) Geraldine C Taylor: PROD; notified  14:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) * Reason: While there are external links none of these show how this athlete is notable. Correct that and the article may remain.
 * 21) Babaji ka thullu: PROD; notified  10:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) * Reason: Pure WP:OR
 * 23) Boris Lozhkin: BLP PROD; notified  11:57, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) Garrett phelan: BLP PROD; notified  12:02, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 25) Textropolis: PROD; notified  15:45, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * Reason: Non notable game
 * 27) John Knapton: PROD; notified  10:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) * Reason: At present there is only trivial detail in this article, but the gentleman appears not to pass WP:ACADEME. More information and verification is required for the article to remain here.
 * 29) Richard A Gabriel: PROD; notified  12:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) * Reason: I have declined a speedy deletion on this article because I believe there is just sufficient notability asserted to avoid that process. However I feel the gentleman does not pass WP:GNG without substantial further research and citations within the article to show that he is notable.
 * 31) Martin Philip Alexander James Carney: BLP PROD; notified  20:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) Vishnu Narayan: PROD; notified  12:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) * Reason: The references tell us that the gentleman exists, but nowhere is any sort of notability stated in the article, nor verified in reliable sources. Without these it may not remain here.
 * 34) Software Integration Testing: Tanevski Methodology: PROD; notified  13:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay.
 * 36) Halls Garden: PROD; notified  13:28, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) * Reason: Because Wikipedia has a partial use as a gazetteer I have chosen to give this article time to develop by sufficient context being added for a determination on notability to be made, but, if it is not improved, it is very likely to be deleted. Where, for example, are these gardens? Why are they notable?
 * 38) Kochouseph Chittilappilly: PROD; notified  17:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) * Reason: Neither of the two references verify and notability for this gentleman.
 * 40) Alexander Cameron (lawyer): PROD; notified  17:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 41) * Reason: Neither of these things are useful attributes for notability. He happened to be a barrister during a notable event, but that does not grant him notability. His brother is an interesting fact, but that does not make this man notable.
 * 42) Innovate Nigeria: PROD; notified  17:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 43) * Reason: Laudable, yes, but there is no notability established for this organisation. Since it has laudable aims I have chosen this slower proposed deletion route to allow the shortfall to be addressed.
 * 44) Participatory research: PROD; notified  22:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 45) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay
 * 46) Ronald G. Fox: BLP PROD; notified  22:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 47) International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research: PROD; notified  23:34, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 48) * Reason: I havem at present, found no sources to verify that this organisation is notable. It has a web site, but Google News (for example) has trouble identifying reliable sources that discuss the organisation. There are primary sources, but, if this organisation has notability it would, surely, feature in news items. I'm happy to be proven top be incorrect, and that sources exist that I haven;t been able to find, so I am choosing the PROD mechanism as a slow burn deletion route that allows article improvement to meet our need for verification of notability.

November 2013

 * 1) Greta Adrian: PROD; notified  13:27, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Despite an assertion of notability], this article has no [[WP:V|references and is unable to remain here without them.
 * 3) Socrates (directer): PROD; notified  17:02, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: The gentleman is not notable. The reference is but a passing mention.
 * 5) Prof. Nawab Pasha: BLP PROD; notified  13:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) UFXMarkets: PROD; notified  14:04, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: This corporation has had a remarkably similar article speedily deleted once as failing WP:GNG. The references are Press Release material or primary sources, and there is no obvious reason that the organisation is at all notable. It appears to be a run of the mill brokerage with nothing to justify an article here. The username of the creating editor also implies some sort of COI and thus trade puffery. I see this as WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT
 * 8) Bernard Ollis: BLP PROD; notified  10:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) Mental Healthcare in India: PROD; notified  16:29, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay and WP:POV piece, suitable for a blog or media article, but not for Wikipedia. Such references that exist are wholly insufficient. WP:TNT is a valid solution here.
 * 11) Q Mobile: PROD; notified  13:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: Some notability is asserted but none is verified. Without verification this article may not remain here
 * 13) Yuan baishun: BLP PROD; notified  12:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) Andrea Pallaoro: BLP PROD; notified  18:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) Shanti Saroop Khindria: BLP PROD; notified  13:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) Nenjam Marappathillai: PROD; notified  23:47, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * Reason: Notable? Seriously? I think not. Without verification of any putative notability this may not remain here

December 2013

 * 1) Evan Spiegel: BLP PROD; notified  23:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Pete's RV Center: PROD; notified  00:09, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: There is sufficient here to pass speedy deletion, a route already declined, but there is insufficient notability for this company to pass the threshold for the article to remain here. If notability can be shown and verified then it may remain.
 * 4) Service-object-oriented architecture: PROD; notified  00:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: This is a WP:OR essay based around a set of primary sources. notability is lacking as are references in reliable sources. It is part of a series of articles by the same editor(s) which appear to be intended as WP:VANISPAMCRUFTISEMENT to create notability for the protagonists in the project(s).
 * 6) Nenjam Marappathillai: PROD; notified  08:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: There are no references in reliable sources for this film. It appears not to be notable. WIthout notability and verification of it this article may not remain here.
 * 8) Deep cement mixing: PROD; notified  12:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * Reason: An essay which does not describe the technique well enough to determine any notability for the underlying technique. Fails WP:GNG
 * 10) Reshoring: PROD; notified  22:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * Reason: Non notable and unreferenced neologism. Show otherwise and the article may have a place here.
 * 12) Alex JV: BLP PROD; notified  22:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) Atgof o'r Sêr: PROD; notified  23:42, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: Articles may not remain here unless they are notable and have that notability verified in reliable sources, though the references do not have to be in English. Welsh is acceptable if any can be found.

January 2014

 * 1) Samaram: BLP PROD; notified  10:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) MaiBoli: PROD; notified  17:14, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: Unreferenced non notable TV station

February 2014

 * 1) Leah Diamond: BLP PROD; notified  15:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Soft fascism: PROD; notified  09:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: Pure WP:OR essay
 * 4) Sivapuri temple: PROD; notified  10:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: Just another non notable and referenced temple. Show it to be notable and reference it and it may stay, otherwise not.
 * 6) Formal Methods in Large Scale Computing Systems: PROD; notified  10:11, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: This article has lots of lovely references, but is original research and synthesised original research and is an essay. To be retained it requires a major rewrite. Even then it does not appear to be notable, something that is a pre-requisite for all articles here. Without that it may not remain,
 * 8) Maskeen Ji: PROD; notified  13:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) * Reason: No proper indication of notability and no references.

March 2014

 * 1) Michael Rõgers: BLP PROD; notified  14:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Crusher in Haryana: PROD; notified  13:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: This is a political soapbox, not a neutral article. It must be rewritten in neutral terms and fully referenced or it must go. Wikipedia articles may not do more than report what is documented in reliable sources, and the material must also be notable.
 * 4) Congress in Haryana: PROD; notified  13:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: Political propaganda and WP:OR disguised as an article
 * 6) Shakti Bhatnagar Roberts: BLP PROD; notified  18:37, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) Rami Weisfisch: PROD; notified  18:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: While this article purports to be about a person it s actually about one or more corporations. WIthout a significant rewrite it cannot remain here as a biography. A valid option would be to move it to a title that reflects its content. However, it is about MMI and MRG. Mr Weisfisch is the common link, but that is all. On the basis of this difficulty I submit that the article requires deletion or a substantial rewrite.
 * 9) Fresh start: PROD; notified  19:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: A potentially pleasant embryo essay or dictionary definition, but there is nothing notable about it. However pleasant it may be it is not material for an encyclopaedia.
 * 11) Vannakalanjiyapulaver: PROD; notified  10:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: The gentleman may well be notable, but the article is vague about notability. Additionally, if there is notability it must be shown by references to reliable sources. Such sources need not be online sources, but sourcing must be present. Without demonstrable notability this article may not remain.
 * 13) Deborah R. Malac: BLP PROD; notified  11:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 14) Talangere stone edict: PROD; notified  12:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 15) * Reason: This is an interesting tale. However, to place this in an encyclopaedia one needs more than interest. It needs to be notable, and substantial references are required in reliable sources. As a side issue, should the article be improved such that it may remain here, I am concerned about the title. It is, surely, an inscription, not an edict?

April 2014

 * 1) La Dormition des amants: PROD; notified  11:51, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: There is nothing to suggest that this is a notable book, nor are there any references for it. It has been hanging around waiting to be expanded for ages. It needs notability to be established, or it must go. References that are not in English are wholly acceptable.
 * 3) PLACES TO SEE IN MUMBAI: PROD; notified  15:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Pure original research and an essay

May 2014

 * 1) Gravity and matter: PROD; notified  10:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Pure orignal research
 * 3) Mogilivaripalli: PROD; notified  10:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Non notable geographic location.
 * 5) Anwar Al-Hamadani: BLP PROD; notified  10:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) Alexander Pushnitsa: BLP PROD; notified  10:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) Foresting life: PROD; notified  11:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: What award? There are no references and this single sentence article is insufficient. IT requires substantial improvement if it is to remain here.
 * 9) Samir Seif: PROD; notified  15:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: I can't see how this gentleman passes WP:GNG, and the sole reference is IMDB, which is not WP:RS

July 2014

 * 1) Society of Vertebrate Paleontology: PROD; notified  06:23, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Only primary sources are used and this has been so for over four years. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42.

August 2014

 * 1) Terence DuQuesne: PROD; notified  12:49, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Fails WP:PROF, WP:BIO. Only sources are primary sources.
 * 3) David Webb (anti-censorship campaigner): PROD; notified  16:46, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Does not pass WP:BIO and the references do not assist
 * 5) Loki der Quaeler: PROD; notified  09:39, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Unreferenced BLP. Provide references and it can stay. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS. No references and it has to go.

October 2014

 * 1) Learning at Home and in the Hospital - LeHo: PROD; notified  08:40, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: While not a copyright violation (the source is licenced for onward use) this is unsuitable as an article for the many reasons flagged at the head. In brief summary of this it is unreferenced WP:OR. Rather than ask for simple deletion I ask that it be moved to the Draft: namespace in order to grant the author time to work on it and to create a suitable article from the draft.
 * 3) Cam actuator: PROD; notified  22:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Unreferenced dicdef
 * 5) Choti Lamsam: PROD; notified  08:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: Unsourced since November 2008

March 2015

 * 1) Staff&Line: PROD; notified  17:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: The organisation is non notable. I offered it at CSD before, but, on seeing that the orginator has long vanished, I feel this is the better approach.


 * We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. My opinion is that this article, if it went through WP:AFC today, would be pushed back for improvement because it is not likely, in its current form, to survive. However, adding the references to verify notability will save it.


 * 1) Sean Patrick Evans: PROD; notified  08:23, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: This person is not notable, or his notability is not asserted and verified. For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS. Solve that and the article may remain here. Fail to solve it and it is likely to be deleted

April 2015

 * 1) Ashish Kashyap: PROD; notified  06:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: The references do not demonstrate, nor does the article assert, notability. For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS.
 * 3) Laylat al-Mabit Verse: PROD; notified  08:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) * Reason: Wikipedia is not a place to create religious tracts. Further, this piece is only referenced by a self published source.
 * 5) Sinai College: PROD; notified  12:52, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 6) * Reason: This is a broadly empty article on a school which goes up to year 7, with no references about a school which is not inherently notable, and has no individual notability asserted nor verified
 * 7) RethinkDB: PROD; notified  13:23, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 8) * Reason: Unreferenced and non notable. For this to survive here we require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. If those are not forthcoming this has no place here.
 * 9) The Incredibly Strange Film Show: PROD; notified  13:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 10) * Reason: For this to remain we require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. IT has not come through the WP:AFC process, despite the banner announcing that it has done so. No notability is asserted nor verified.
 * 11) GoGoDragons: PROD; notified  08:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reason: This is a premature move from Draft: space to main namespace. Ordinarily I would move it back, but the contributing editor has moved it here twice, now, and I doubt any further improvement will happen in Draft: space. The article requires better references that assert and verify its notability. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Without those references it cannot remain here. With them there is no issue.
 * 13) OptionRally: PROD; notified  08:47, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 14) * Reason: The referencing is seriously lacking. This appears to be WP:ADMASQ. with pseudo-references to generic things, directories or PR pieces. The routes for this are deletion, improvement where it stands, or return to draft space to be worked on. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. References that do not comply with this need to be replaced.
 * 15) Institute of Leadership & Management: PROD; notified  19:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 16) * Reason: There are no references to verify any notability. WP:ADMASQ. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Without those it may not remain here
 * 17) Rakesh Jain (businessman): PROD; notified  16:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 18) * Reason: This is improperly referenced. I have analysed the current references:


 * 1) http://www.business-standard.com/article/pf/general-insurance-rakesh-jain-114020200793_1.html is ‘’by’’ the gentleman. Fail
 * 2) https://www.reliancegeneral.co.in/insurance/About-Us/Reliance-General-Insurance.aspx Primary source.WP:PRIMARY applies, but this is not important to the biography. Fail
 * 3) http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/banking/reliance-general-insurance-diversifying-into-new-areas-segments/article4941502.ece is an interview with the gentleman, and this primary. Fail
 * 4) http://www.business-standard.com/article/finance/we-will-break-even-in-the-next-18-months-rakesh-jain-112072000039_1.html is an interview with the gentleman, and this primary. Fail
 * 5) http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/agricultural-insurance-is-acquiring-big-dimension-rakesh-jain-113091800150_1.html is an interview with the gentleman, and this primary. Fail
 * 6) http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/we-are-offering-service-guarantee-to-restore-customer-faith-reliance-general-insurance/1174226/ seems to be slightly more in depth coverage and quasi-independent. Borderline

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, and is in WP:RS. Without that this article may not remain.
 * 1) Africa Theological Journal: PROD; notified  10:59, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Unreferenced. Notability is not verified. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42

May 2015

 * 1) Sergio Ajvaz: BLP PROD; notified  15:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) The Band Project: PROD; notified  16:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) * Reason: We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. With references meeting those criteria this may remain here. Without them it needs to go
 * 4) IServer: PROD; notified  15:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 5) * Reason: I do not consider an "honourable mention" to confirm WP:N. This needs further referencing to confirm that it has notability. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42
 * 6) Perry Noble: PROD; notified  09:41, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 7) * Reason: Non notable pastor. BLP1E. Primary sources.
 * 8) P&R Publishing: PROD; notified  12:55, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 9) * Reason: Fails WP:CORP We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Without those it may not remain here.

September 2015

 * 1) Royston Sta Maria: BLP PROD; notified  11:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

 * 1) Moneycorp: PROD; notified  21:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 2) * Reason: Notability is not established. The references are mainly from the org itself, and those theatre not add no value to verification of notability

July 2020

 * Shuvro: PROD; notified 13:01, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. PROD added to give author a fighting chance to sort out referencing

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this article survive (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
 * Link prediction: PROD; notified 22:09, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Without references it is impossible to deterge whether this is original research or a synthesis of published material Placing this notice of proposed deletion grants a finite time for references to be provided.

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this article above to remain here (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.
 * Varya Rajput and Chaudharies of Ambota: PROD; notified 18:55, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unreferenced with no assertion of notability. PROD is used here to give editors time to improve the article, but with an end date when it becomes eligible for deletion. Looking at the talk page it seems to me that it is very unlikely that notability can be verified. If you can verify it then remove this notice

August 2020

 * Sports Nippon: PROD; notified 06:36, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unreferenced stub. We need at east one good reference for it to stay
 * Neil Levesque: PROD; notified 19:25, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: 100% unreferenced. Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG
 * File:Drroyalworking.jpg ([ log]): PROD; notified 12:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).

September 2020

 * Institute for Social and European Studies: PROD; notified 11:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: unreferenced since April 2009, created by an SPA then.
 * Charles Nwodo Jr.: PROD; notified 07:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: While it is likely that the gentleman is inherently notable, this is not the article that asserts it nor verifies it. As written he is a run of the mill businessman. The majority of the references are for his corporations. One at least is an interview with him, thus both unreliable and primary. It needs to be re-written to be about the gentleman, with his corporations simply being matters of interest, not the major thrust. If his corporations are notable they may have a separate article, but they have undue weight in this article. Draftification and incubation there with reviewer comments and eventual acceptance might be the route to go other than deletion should the relevant improvements not be forthcoming main space

February 2021

 * Poobah (band): PROD; notified 21:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This appears to be an excuse for multiple links to sell the band's wares. It is thus an advert. That is something that can be solved.

March 2021

 * The Movement Disorder Society: PROD; notified 12:17, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Only referenced by the society's own journal.

April 2021

 * Velakkaran (TV series): PROD; notified 18:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: not notable TV series. Fails WP:GNG
 * UDOO: PROD; notified 11:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Two of the alleged references are to fundraising pages! The third is to a fan page. This is an advert, both for the unit and to raise money for it

June 2021

 * Site reliability engineering: PROD; notified 06:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This is an overblown WP:DICDEF for a Google created IT Neologism. A précis might have a place in Wiktionary, but this article is not suitable for an encyclopaedia. All the references return to Google
 * Michel de Kemmeter: PROD; notified 13:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: The sole reference is a permanent dead link. I cannot find anything on Google Scholar to show he passes WP:NPROF, and WP:BEFORE does not find a great deal of anything useful.

July 2021

 * Pharmaceutical Society of Australia: PROD; notified 16:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Unreferenced since March 2021. Time to find references or for it to go

October 2021

 * Tiwa Root Village Deties: PROD; notified 13:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Lacks context; impossible to determine notability. I'm not even sure what the title means

November 2021

 * Muhammad Khair Al Shaal: PROD; notified 08:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: There is no significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article. Lacks notability and has not been shown to pass WP:BIO

January 2022

 * Blxckie: PROD; notified 08:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:NMUSICIAN, is WP:TOOSOON, and is written from a fan's viewpoint

July 2022

 * Kunsthall Trondheim: PROD; notified 19:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: This article purports to be about the venue but majors on the exhibitions mounted. I've suggested this deletion process to encourage the contributing editors to shake it into shape. It has, I think, escaped from Draft: space too early, and might benefit from being placed back there in order to be worked on in peace and quiet, but I've chosen not to do so because mainspace has a habit of attracting editors who will turn it into a worthwhile article

September 2022

 * Saraburi Men's Volleyball Club: PROD; notified 12:40, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) * Reason: Fails WP:GNG. Unsourced. Draft exists. This is a copy and paste move

October 2023

 * Nick Jordan (Italian actor): BLP PROD; notified 16:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)