User:Tinarss/Estrone/progesterone/Jazlynquintana Peer Review

-Everything in the article is relevant to the topic

-The article is neutral/no biases.

-Viewpoints are equally represented

-Citations look good- links work- sources support claims

-Facts supported by references

-Neutral sources

-Info is up to date

~

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)