User:Tisaachsu/Brachymesia furcata/Tkshimiz Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Tisaachsu - Timothy Hsu


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tisaachsu/Brachymesia_furcata?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Brachymesia furcata

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * At first glance, your draft looks like a typical wikipedia article I would see. Your intro/lead is very concise and to the point without being too detailed. It provides a brief outline of the topics you will discuss in the subsections without revealing too much and even goes into the conservation which I thought was pretty interesting.

Content


 * The content you listen seems to be relevant to your species and doesn't go off topic too much talking about other species or organisms. Everything you mentioned seems up to date and everything seems to belong on the article. The viewpoints you mentioned seem to be equally discussed without over or under representing any topics.

Tone and Balance


 * The overall tone and and balance seems pretty neutral without having any strong claims or opinions about these species. Maybe one can argue that the information about the egg is a bit short relative to the other stages but there might not be much information.

Sources and Reference


 * The sources you listed also seem to be within the last decade or so especially in the introduction where you cited about 6 articles. Overall, it seems like a credible and insightful start for a Wikipedia article. The sources you listed all seem to be reliable and comes from a diverse spectrum of authors and backgrounds.

Organization


 * The formatting is on point and has all the necessary information needed to learn more about the species you were assigned. No grammatical or spelling errors were identified and the organization of the headers are appropriate as well.

Images and Media


 * One thing I would suggest to add is a few pictures since I like seeing pictures especially of species that are foreign to me and have never learned about. I feel like you have enough details to include a few pictures that can be easily found and cited from the internet.

Overall Impression


 * I also like how you included the conservation statuses of your species as that is typically not included in other articles and is hardly mentioned despite being an important topic. This is something I would definitely see on a Wikipedia page and it would benefit me greatly if I were studying the habitat and developmental stages of your species.