User:Tjade21/University of Chile Student Federation/Capricon13 Peer Review

General info
(provide username) Taylor. Username: Tjade21
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tjade21/University_of_Chile_Student_Federation?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):University of Chile Student Federation

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Section: The lead section has been updated. Taylor made it clear that the orgnization was a political student orgization. The intro sentance is clear and describes the FECh. I like how Taylor added the part on the 2011 protest to the lead section since she goes indepth about it in the article. Lead section is detailed, but there is a lot of information in the article so it makes sense.

Content: The content added is relevant to the topic. The main content Taylor added is the 2011 protests which, Taylor said actually had its own Wiki page. The only part that is not up to date is the section that says that we FECh President is unknown. I would keep the 2016 protest just because it is the most recent.

Tone and Balance: Content is a neutral tone, that helps to expand on the facts. The conetent that is missing is the section of who the FECh president is now. All view points have an equal representaion.

Sources and Referances: Yes! The article before only had 2 sources and one of them the page was unavaible. Taylor has added 6 sources. All sources are sendondary sources, they all seem to work. The sources added many important facts and details about the FECh. I like how she added details on Augusto Pinochet and what his contribuations were.

Organization: The content is essay to read and organizaed well.

Images: There is only one image on the page. The image is of the FECh headquators. I think it would be benifical to add images from their protests.

Overall impressions: Taylor helped the quality of this article by added 6 sources. Before her article only had 2, which made the imopression that the information was not diverse. The strengths on the content is that it helps to expand facts. There was nothing about the 2011 protest on the orginall article. Adding the section on this protest shows that the FEChn has been active recently. I also like how she added the membership increase in the 1960s. The content could be improved by adding more about the FECh today. Since this organization is still running today it would be important to have a section on this.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)