User:Tjgolden/sandbox

In the Wikipedia article entitled "Ladies Learning Code," there isn't much to improve as far as content because there isn't much written so far. The article begins by explaining what the Ladies Learning Code is and what it seeks to achieve. It goes on to explain the history of this organization in two brief sentences, the last of which leaves the reader with many questions and appears to be a very abrupt ending sentence. The second paragraph gives the reader more context and clarity, introducing other related learning codes. These other codes, however, are not hyperlinks so the reader does not have the option to further interact with the text by visiting a branching article. The only heading is "Girls Learning Code" which can include more information about what it is like now as opposed to in 2012. Other learning codes mentioned in the first paragraph should appear as headings if the Girls Learning Code does because it will give the reader consistency and more material at his or her disposal. The author fails to define unfamiliar terms such as "live workshops" and "The Lab." I believe that representing a worldview of an organization that exists solely in Canada is difficult because it is not a topic that is universally discussed, but I think it is important that the article represents both a worldview and a comparison, even if it's brief, of the education system in Canada as opposed to in other countries. On the plus side, many sources are cited in comparison to the article's short length which boosts the credibility of the article as a whole and the sources appear unbiased and mainly factual. This article needs more content than revision, unlike most articles I've viewed. This article can be made better by including more subheadings about various codes, information about the history of and motivation behind the organization, and discussion of what the Girls Learning Code is like now after 5 years of being in operation. It sounds like a great thing according to the article, but the benefits of the learning code aren't clearly outline so the importance of this organization may be question by those who are not familiar with it. Overall I believe that this article can be made better my mainly adding more content and expounding upon the information that it introduces.