User:Tlaforge/Brown bear/Presleygilbert Peer Review

Lead

The lead has been updated to reflect the new information added.

The introductory sentence clearly explains the topic, but a brief description of the major sections is not included.

The lead doesn't include information that is not present in the article, but it could be a little more concise.

Content

The content added is relevant to the topic, but the introductory sentence could be worded in a more evidence-supported way rather than a more speculative way. I feel it would be better to word the sentece in a way that presents research findings. I can't tell how up to date the content is because I dont see the references to look at the date of the research findings. All of the content seems to belong in the paragraph accordingly. The content does not seem biased towards a certain viewpoint or way.

Sources and References

The sources are both correctly cited within the paragraph, but it would be helpful to add the hyperlinks to the citations pertaining to each source.

I can't tell if the sources are easy to find or reliable because I dont have access to a reference page or titles.

Overall Impression

The content added has the potential to improve the article's quality by providing information about hibernation physiology in brown bears and is overall a great start.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):