User:Tmbloyed/Deodar forests/Cook.tanner Peer Review

Peer review
I am reviewing Tmbloyed article about the Deodar Forests. The link to the draft is here:User:Tmbloyed/sandbox

There isn't really a typically lead its just a section self titled Deodar Forests. Other than that the section is very concise; I really like the use live links. I feel there could be more information added, at the moment its a little sparse. Also I would love to see Sources for the lead at the moment there are none. The content in this draft is very relevant. Looking at the sources the information seems to be up to date. the only content missing is sections Tmbloyed has yet to fill in, but he has added more content than the original article page. The content is very information and keeps a neutral and unbiased tone throughout. All information seems to be backed up with a source except the lead section which contains no source. All sources work and are current, with the oldest being from 2010. The content is well written and organized being broken up into 6 sections: Native Forests, Urban Forests, Understory, Climate, Threats and Challenges, and Cultural Importance. Climate being the only section with nothing in it. The structure of the sentences could be cleaned up a little. There is no media or pictures yet. Overall this this draft shows a lot of potential. It goes a very good job expanding on the subject and adding sections. It does need some more sources and to be filled up in the climate section. It could also use a little more expansion and growth, but overall I'm excited to see where the draft goes.