User:Tmcbrid1/sandbox


 * 1) Is everything in the article relevant to the topic? Is there anything that distracted you or you felt was inappropriate?
 * 2) I think that the article was pretty simple and straightforward in explaining Meglitinides. I think that the mechanism of action part could have been simplified more and explained more about the pancreatic beta cells and how they work to lower blood sugar rather than going into the depolarization of Ca2+ voltage gated channels.
 * 3) Do the links Work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * 4) The links work but i’m not sure if the first link is a reliable source. The mechanism of action came from the first link but it wasn’t referenced. The second and third links were used in the side effects section. I think that the side effects section could have been a little more detailed since that is what most people want to look up any way.
 * 5) Is each fact referenced with an appropriate reliable reference?
 * 6) The paragraph with the mechanism of action did not have any references. The side effects paragraph didn’t have any references either.  The facts about Repaglinide causing an increased incidence of adenomas of the thyroid and liver in rats but not seen with nateglinide was properly referenced.