User:Tmeiss/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Environmental science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is about environmental science and the title indicates that it is an over branching topic. This topic is important because it puts together the pollution of the earth within each field if science. The article breaks down the different concepts of the science field of environmental science.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The components are well laid out. It may be missing other components to environmental sciences like biological sciences, and more. The information about when environmental science became more popular in society does not seem relevant. Strengths are the lay out of article, it is clear and concise. The article components ecology, atmospheric sciences, environmental chemistry, and geosciences are strong and on topic of environmental sciences.

Some of the sources are older than ten years and can be considered out of date. The source of Silent Spring is not relevant or current to the topic of environmental sciences. Article is not bias. The article has a neutral voice. The article is missing more about pollution in the sciences. The addition of pollution will make the article more important and influential.