User:Tmissell/Adam Ragusea/HunterWWW Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Thomas Missell
 * Adam Ragusea

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Lead has been updated
 * Lead has sufficient introductory sentence
 * Lead missing brief description of main sections
 * All info in lead present in article
 * Concise lead

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Content added is relevant
 * Content is up to date - includes subscriber count, views
 * Does not seem to be any content missing, and all content that is present relates back to the topic in a logical way
 * None of the content in the article seems to be controversial or addressing any tough subjects. All content is appropriate and relevant

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Content added does not push any bias, is very neutral and informational
 * No claims in the article appear heavily biased in any direction, information seems to be neutral
 * Seems to be lacking a bit in describing his YouTube career. It says that he launched the channel in 2010, but the information on the channel itself is a bit sparse
 * Content added does not try and persuade reader into believing anything about Adam Ragusea other than the facts

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * All new content is backed up by secondary source
 * Sources are thorough - a couple of them lead directly to videos off of Ragusea's channel, which is about as accurate as you can get with a topic like this
 * Sources are current
 * Sources written by diverse authors, coming from many different kinds of sources
 * Tested links work

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Content is well written and is blocked off in logical categories
 * No grammatical or spelling errors
 * Content is well organized into blocks of information that flow well and make sense

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * N/A - no images added

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Not a new article

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Content added has given a clearer idea of who Adam Ragusea is and provides insight into not only his popular internet persona, but his lesser known personal life as well.
 * Strengths include the abundance of links and sources cited
 * Content could be improved by expanding on information surrounding his YouTube channel, as well as adding images/media to the article, maybe of Adam himself or the food he cooks