User:Tmp1071/Populus tremuloides/GoldFinch14 Peer Review

General info
Tmp1071
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Tmp1071/Populus tremuloides
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Populus tremuloides

Evaluate the drafted changes
So I'm a little confused on what you added, but I'll review what I think is going on. I really appreciate that you added citations for sources that needed them, like the one about moths and butterflies. I would add information in the lead about the dieback information you added, just so all your bases are covered in the lead. The information you added is relevant to the article, and written really well, so props for that. I think all of your sources seem up to date, so that's good. The information you added seems unbiased and neutral, and you have citations for all the things that need it. Nice job.

The first two sentences in the ecology section are kind of confusing. Maybe combine them? The first one seems like a fragment. I feel like this sentence: "Furthermore, climate records show that historically, most periods of aspen decline have been paired with periods of severe drought, which has worsened in recent years due to a changing climate." needs a citation. Overall, I think this is a really good addition to this page! -Aimee